[yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Robert P. J. Day
just got an intel galileo board, and want to whip together a yocto-built image for it on my fedora rawhide system. before even starting, a quick google showed me that people seemed to be having trouble: https://communities.intel.com/thread/51115 where are the canonical instructions for buildin

Re: [yocto] Third Party Components Integration in Yocto

2014-05-08 Thread Meenakumari Shedole
Thanks Alex, Yes I installed FILES_${PN} all package folders are creating Tried devshell but there is no installed bb-example in image/usr/include/...empty include folder. Bb-example is not loading inside image/.. Analysed log_devshell , log_package, do_install, do_make. Even I compared

Re: [yocto] Third Party Components Integration in Yocto

2014-05-08 Thread Alex J Lennon
Hi Meena, On 08/05/2014 11:05, Meenakumari Shedole wrote: > > Thanks Alex, > > > > Yes I installed FILES_${PN} all package folders are creating > > Tried devshell but there is no installed bb-example in > image/usr/include/...empty include folder. Bb-example is not loading > inside image/.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] dylan: fix kconfig-frontends for ncurses --with-libterm

2014-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 23:07 +, Woodyatt, James wrote: > commit 939c9feca3c26d4603b573d887324d6220e93819 > Author: james woodyatt > Date: Mon May 5 15:54:29 2014 -0700 > > kconfig-frontends-native: add support for --with-libterm. > > This is a cherry-pick of cefcd4b655c2b7efdc63

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto: remove PRINC warning

2014-05-08 Thread Martin Jansa
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:49:28PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote: > Convert PRINC to PR .= so as to not break package feeds. Next time this > won't be necessary at all. > > Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald > --- > recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend |2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Diego Sueiro
Robert, Here is some instructions with some workarounds: http://www.malinov.com/Home/sergey-s-blog/intelgalileo-buildinglinuximage And I think that you already saw meta-intel-iot-devkit: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-iot-devkit/ As soon as I get my Galileo I'll try to put

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 04:58, Neuer User wrote: > I had a brief look at connman half a year ago, but that time I was > unable to find a good documentation about it. Do you have by chance a > link to some tutorial or at least man entry for the configuration? What do you need to configure? For "when ethern

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Robert, > Here is some instructions with some workarounds: > http://www.malinov.com/Home/sergey-s-blog/intelgalileo-buildinglinuximage > > And I think that you already saw meta-intel-iot-devkit: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-iot-de

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] dylan: fix C++ standard library headers on OS X

2014-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 23:12 +, Woodyatt, James wrote: > Resend, this time with all contents. > > commit 562fa987cea60d61c256195adce7e83bf1c1a8c9 > Author: james woodyatt > Date: Thu May 1 14:44:39 2014 -0700 > > Fix C++ standard library header directory configuration. > > Remo

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] meta-darwin on dylan branch

2014-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 19:03 +, Woodyatt, James wrote: > commit 4c50f7bd62a675dd1f034bc6730f833c6dca0c19 > Author: james woodyatt > Date: Thu May 1 11:57:41 2014 -0700 > > Remove usage of ‘new typename’ constructors in ld64 part of odcctools2 > package. > I've applied this fix to the

Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc

2014-05-08 Thread Joe MacDonald
[Re: [yocto] replace udhcpc] On 14.05.08 (Thu 05:54) Neuer User wrote: > Am 07.05.2014 11:27, schrieb Søren Holm: > > Use ifplugd recipe I just submitted. > > > > Very nice idea. Where do I find the recipe? Søren withdrew the submission to meta-networking following further discussion. http://p

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto: remove PRINC warning

2014-05-08 Thread Joe MacDonald
[Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux][PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto: remove PRINC warning] On 14.05.08 (Thu 12:34) Martin Jansa wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:49:28PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote: > > Convert PRINC to PR .= so as to not break package feeds. Next time this > > won't be necessary at all. > > >

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto custom device tree in overlay

2014-05-08 Thread Andreas Galauner
On 07/05/14 21:37, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > So you can either patch it into the kernel, or do a bbappend with > that copies it into the source tree > (linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/mydevicetree.dts). Thx! That worked fine. For reference, this is what I added: > do_install_prepend() { > cp ${WORKDI

[yocto] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
Hi all, Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is unmaintained so we don't

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStreamer 1.x. GStreame

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 16:07, Paul Eggleton wrote: > The next question is does that mean for the "old" libav (which gst-ffmpeg > depends upon), do we move that as well or drop it? If gst-ffmpeg is the sole consumer, then certainly yes. Ross -- ___ yocto mailin

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto custom device tree in overlay

2014-05-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-08 09:48 AM, Andreas Galauner wrote: On 07/05/14 21:37, Bruce Ashfield wrote: So you can either patch it into the kernel, or do a bbappend with that copies it into the source tree (linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/mydevicetree.dts). Thx! That worked fine. Glad to hear! Bruce For referenc

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 8 mei 2014, om 16:48 heeft Burton, Ross het volgende geschreven: > Hi all, > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStre

[yocto] SATO on Intel DN2800MT

2014-05-08 Thread r10kindsofpeople
I'm trying to experiment with the SATO build on a DN2800MT with a VGA monitor, but can't seem to get going. The binaries from Daisy and genericX86 get as far as the Yocto progress bar complete, and then go black. Any quick hints? I note also that genericX86 looks like a complete Yocto tree rathe

Re: [yocto] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Burton, Ross
On 8 May 2014 15:48, Burton, Ross wrote: > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > meta-multimedia, and ensure everything in oe-core has ported to > GStreamer 1.x. GStreamer 0.10 is considered dead upstream and is > unmaintained so we don't need to be shipping both v

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > > > For the 1.7 release I want to move GStreamer 0.10 from oe-core into > > meta-multimed

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 08 May 2014 18:19:08 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Sorry for the cross-post but I want this to have a wide audience. > > > > > > For the 1.7 releas

[yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 2/3] opkg-make-index: Recursively scan for packages

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Barker
The new 'relpath' argument to the initialiser of a Package object is used so that file paths will be given relative to the base packages directory. Paths are given relative to pkg_dir as that seems to make the most sense. It certainly works when the 'Packages' file is written to pkg_dir. If the 'P

[yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 1/3] opkg.py: Allow filename to be a relative path

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Barker
In order to support package files residing in a different directory to the 'Packages' index file, we need to allow filename entries in the index to be relative paths. In order to not break existing code, filename remains the basename of fn by default. However, if the new relpath argument is set the

[yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 0/3] Patches to support hierarchical package feeds

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Barker
I'm posting these patches in the hope that someone other than me has some memory of how the internals of opkg-utils work and can give me a quick review. I can merge these myself but as they will affect all ipk feeds created by OpenEmbedded I think it's worth at least trying to get a review on the c

[yocto] [opkg-utils][PATCH 3/3] opkg-update-index: Emit relative path to package file

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Barker
The new relpath argument of the Package object constructor is used so that the relative path from pkg_dir to the package file will be placed in the package index. The allows the package file to be in a subdirectory of pkg_dir. Signed-off-by: Paul Barker --- opkg-update-index | 2 +- 1 file chang

Re: [yocto] SATO on Intel DN2800MT

2014-05-08 Thread Chris Tapp
Hi John, On 8 May 2014, at 16:25, r10kindsofpeople wrote: > I'm trying to experiment with the SATO build on a DN2800MT with a VGA > monitor, but can't seem to get going. The binaries from Daisy and genericX86 > get as far as the Yocto progress bar complete, and then go black. Any quick > hi

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday 08 May 2014 18:19:08 Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Sorry for the cross-po

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 08 May 2014 19:21:44 Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 05:57:54PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Thursday 08 May 2014 18:19:08 Martin Jansa wrote: > > > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 04:07:19PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > > > On Thursday 08 May 2014 15:48:40 Burton, Ross w

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 2/2] omxplayer: Separate build directory is broken for this package

2014-05-08 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: If08395ecd79c1d8e9a269ba03efba863de8dbe9d Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-multimedia/omxplayer/omxplayer_git.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes-multimedia/omxplayer/omxplayer_git.bb b/recipes-multimedia/omxplayer/omxplayer_git.bb i

[yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH 1/2] bcm2835: Fix recipe when using separate build directory

2014-05-08 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Change-Id: I18f41c1cd3a0b1158e96e6d2d4455268700d3496 Signed-off-by: Andrei Gherzan --- recipes-bcm/bcm2835/bcm2835_1.36.bb | 25 - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-bcm/bcm2835/bcm2835_1.36.bb b/recipes-bcm/bcm2835/bcm2835_1.36.bb ind

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] xserver-xf86-config: remove changes of THISDIR and FILESPATH

2014-05-08 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Michaël Burtin wrote: > THISDIR and FILESPATH are not supposed to be changed from within > recipes. This was causing troubles with other bbappend. > > Change-Id: I7c3c788ddb61b0b790a9fe06f86e4bd93a822c8c > Signed-off-by: Michaël Burtin > --- > recipes-graphics/xo

Re: [yocto] SATO on Intel DN2800MT

2014-05-08 Thread r10kindsofpeople
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: > Hi John, > > On 8 May 2014, at 16:25, r10kindsofpeople > wrote: > > > I'm trying to experiment with the SATO build on a DN2800MT with a VGA > monitor, but can't seem to get going. The binaries from Daisy and > genericX86 get as far as the Yoc

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Diego Sueiro wrote: > Robert, > Here is some instructions with some workarounds: > http://www.malinov.com/Home/sergey-s-blog/intelgalileo-buildinglinuximage > > And I think that you already saw meta-intel-iot-devkit: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-iot-de

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] Remove uses of PRINC

2014-05-08 Thread Andrei Gherzan
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 03:46:44PM +, Paul Barker wrote: > PRINC is now obsolete and the PR Service should be used instead to keep PR > values incrementing on change. > > A patch has also been submitted to openembedded-core to bump the appropriate > PR > values so that PR doesn't move backward

Re: [yocto] Daisy branch for meta-raspberrypi

2014-05-08 Thread Andrei Gherzan
Daisy branch was created in all repos (yocto, github and gerrit). Thanks. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Paul Barker wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking to create a new Raspberry Pi image now Yocto 1.6 is out. > oe-core has a 'daisy' branch and meta-openembedded should be following > soon. > > Could

[yocto] [PATCH 9/9] linux-yocto: migrate from 3.10 to 3.14

2014-05-08 Thread Joe MacDonald
The default kernel is now 3.14. Since the removal of PRINC support leaves the 3.10 recipe in a difficult-to-work-with state, now seems like a good time to move to the new kernel. Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald --- .../linux/{linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend => linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend}|1 - 1 f

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Rob Woolley wrote: > Hi Rob, > Have you seen the Quark BSP Build Guide? > > https://communities.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/21882-102-1-25153/Quark_BSPBuildGuide_329687_001.pdf already on my reading/testing list, but i'm still reluctant to jump over this issue

Re: [yocto] couple simple questions on building for intel galileo

2014-05-08 Thread Rob Woolley
Hi Rob, Have you seen the Quark BSP Build Guide? https://communities.intel.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/21882-102-1-25153/Quark_BSPBuildGuide_329687_001.pdf Regards, Rob On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 8 May 2014, Diego Sueiro wrote: > > > Robert, > >

Re: [yocto] SATO on Intel DN2800MT

2014-05-08 Thread Chris Tapp
On 8 May 2014, at 18:52, r10kindsofpeople wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: > Hi John, > > On 8 May 2014, at 16:25, r10kindsofpeople wrote: > > > I'm trying to experiment with the SATO build on a DN2800MT with a VGA > > monitor, but can't seem to get going. The bin

[yocto] Does Yocto need some "LTS" releases?

2014-05-08 Thread Chris Tapp
I've had a few potential clients ask how security updates and general patches are applied to embedded products built using Yocto. If they're really embedded, then the only way to to this is by replacing the rootfs - especially when they boot read-only. A second complication is when support for

Re: [yocto] Does Yocto need some "LTS" releases?

2014-05-08 Thread Mark Hatle
On 5/8/14, 2:54 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: I've had a few potential clients ask how security updates and general patches are applied to embedded products built using Yocto. The Yocto Project, via it's contributors usually provides support for the -two- releases + master. That means effectively a

Re: [yocto] Does Yocto need some "LTS" releases?

2014-05-08 Thread Chris Tapp
Hi Mark, Thanks for the comments. On 8 May 2014, at 21:11, Mark Hatle wrote: > On 5/8/14, 2:54 PM, Chris Tapp wrote: >> I've had a few potential clients ask how security updates and general patches >> are applied to embedded products built using Yocto. > > The Yocto Project, via it's contribut

[yocto] [meta-selinux] build issue

2014-05-08 Thread akuster@mvista
Hello, I am trying to build meta-selinux and ran into some build issues. I started by cloning poky and meta-selinux. I am using master on both. When I run "bitbake core-image-selinux", I get the following errors. ERROR: No recipes available for: /home/armin/work/yocto/poky/meta-selinux/recip

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] GStreamer 0.10's future

2014-05-08 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 17:57 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > Yes, I'm just talking about libav 0.8 here - libav 9 would remain where it > is. > That might still be problematic though given that their PN is the same. I'm > open to better suggestions, but I think we have to do *something* here. We c

Re: [yocto] Does Yocto need some "LTS" releases?

2014-05-08 Thread Michael Stickel
On 08.05.2014 23:00, Chris Tapp wrote: > However, I still need to work at convincing people that it's not always as > simple as updating one package as the update can have knock-on effects else > where - which is why a "simple" update can end up being very time consuming > and/or costly to impl

Re: [yocto] Does Yocto need some "LTS" releases?

2014-05-08 Thread Philip Balister
On 05/08/2014 02:53 PM, Michael Stickel wrote: > > On 08.05.2014 23:00, Chris Tapp wrote: >> However, I still need to work at convincing people that it's not always as >> simple as updating one package as the update can have knock-on effects else >> where - which is why a "simple" update can end

Re: [yocto] Definition of Yocto tasks

2014-05-08 Thread Bob Feretich
On 5/7/2014 5:58 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 06 May 2014 15:23:45 Bob Feretich wrote: On 5/6/2014 2:38 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Tuesday 06 May 2014 06:47:08 Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject

Re: [yocto] [meta-selinux] build issue

2014-05-08 Thread Joe MacDonald
Hi Armin, I'm guessing you don't have BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY set in your local.conf. I'm working through some other build issues right now, but certainly nothing like what you're seeing. :-) -J. On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:07 PM, akuster@mvista wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to build meta-

[yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-08 Thread Paul McGougan
Hi all. We are currently using Poky 1.5.0. We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board. We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob. To that end, in our custom layer we have a file poky/meta-OURS/recipes-kernel/lin

Re: [yocto] Definition of Yocto tasks

2014-05-08 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Bob, This is good information regarding the process you had to go through and what would have helped along the way. I am currently working on a new chapter that documents the do_ tasks in the YP Reference Manual. Scott >-Original Message- >From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mail

Re: [yocto] Third Party Components Integration in Yocto

2014-05-08 Thread Meenakumari Shedole
Thanks for your response Alex. I gone with all these steps but not helpful. Here I am sharing my recipe and bb-example.bb and do_install log. bb-example.bb: LICENSE = "GPLv2+" LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=751419260aa954499f7abaabaa882bbe" PR = "r0" inherit module SRC_URI =   "f