Dear all,
I'm migrating a project from oe-classic to yocto 1.2.
This goes fairly smoothly. Got some warnings I reported before.
If I build my app it runs fine (with the uclibc from oe-classic that
is already on the board).
Next step was to try to build a complete image.
There I encountered two i
Hi Bruce,
Thanks a lot for your help.
Now I am able to build the local kernel.
I have one doublt:
when I do
bitbake -c mencuconfig virtual/kernel
then from which location it will take the config file?.
and if I want to buiild my own specific defconfig file then How can do it?.
Best Regards,
Om
On Thursday 03 May 2012 10:28:57 shushm wrote:
> I want to know which usb camera does the yocto support?
The question is not which cameras the Yocto Project supports but which ones
are supported by the Linux kernel and any user-space software that you might
want to use with the camera. I would r
On Thursday 03 May 2012 08:01:58 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> Isn't openembedded-core shared with yocto's poky? If so, do I really need to
> add openembedded-core to my bblayers.conf file?
Yes, poky includes OE-Core already, so you don't need to add anything for
this.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
I
Dear Sirs,
for my cortex A8 based system, I am in the need to deploy
a sort of "safe mode image" that should bootstrap only
in case of system recovery.
This image fits particularily well the model of a ramfs based system
with contents such as core-image-minimal-mtdutils plus some tools
additi
On 2012-05-03 04:22, giovanni.pav...@exorint.it wrote:
Dear Sirs,
for my cortex A8 based system, I am in the need to deploy
a sort of "safe mode image" that should bootstrap only
in case of system recovery.
This image fits particularily well the model of a ramfs based system
with contents such
Hi,
For my overo-fire-chestnut43.conf machine configuration, if I specify
u-boot in the EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS as follows:
EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS = "u-boot x-load"
Is there any purpose served by specifying uboot in the MACHINE_FEATURES as
follows ?
MACHINE_FEATURES = "kernel26 alsa apm usbgadget
Hi,
If in my overo.inc file, I specify the following:
SOC_FAMILY = "omap3"
require conf/machine/include/soc-family.inc
require conf/machine/include/omap3.inc
require conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa8.inc
Is it necessary to specify TARGET_ARCH = "arm" for the machine configuration?
The m
On Thursday 03 May 2012 12:42:24 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> Hi,
> If in my overo.inc file, I specify the following:
>
> SOC_FAMILY = "omap3"
> require conf/machine/include/soc-family.inc
>
> require conf/machine/include/omap3.inc
> require conf/machine/include/tune-cortexa8.inc
>
> Is it necess
On Thursday 03 May 2012 11:49:08 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Also, it's worth noting that in current meta-ti master you don't need to
> require tune-cortexa8.inc either since omap3.inc does this too (unless
> you're wanting to support use with an older version of the meta-ti layer).
Similarly the follo
Hi Paul,
On May 3, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 11:49:08 Paul Eggleton wrote:
>> Also, it's worth noting that in current meta-ti master you don't need to
>> require tune-cortexa8.inc either since omap3.inc does this too (unless
>> you're wanting to support use
On 12-05-03 05:24 AM, Om Prakash PAL wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Thanks a lot for your help.
Now I am able to build the local kernel.
Great!
I have one doublt:
when I do
bitbake -c mencuconfig virtual/kernel
then from which location it will take the config file?.
and if I want to buiild my own specific
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:22 PM, wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> for my cortex A8 based system, I am in the need to deploy
> a sort of "safe mode image" that should bootstrap only
> in case of system recovery.
>
> This image fits particularily well the model of a ramfs based system
> with contents such a
On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for
amt/mei, and refactors some existing config options into a new
echi-hcd, which is then used in crownbay.
If this looks like the way to go, I'll add similar USB fea
Hi,
I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get a
build error when I run the following command:
$ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main build
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
On Thursday 03 May 2012 14:56:03 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get
> a build error when I run the following command:
>
> $ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal
>
> Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before t
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 08:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Zanussi
> >
> > This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for
> > amt/mei, and refactors some existing config options into a new
> > echi-hcd, which is then u
Already mentioned this yesterday in the channel, but was not picked up.
the channel topic could be changed to refer to 1.2 i.s.o. 1.1
not sure who has the powers to do so.
Have fun, Frnas
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctop
On 12-05-03 09:50 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 08:40 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-02 11:35 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi
This adds a few new features, one for xhci-hcd and another for
amt/mei, and refactors some existing config options into a new
e
Hi,
I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get a
build error when I run the following command:
$ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first before the main build
WARNING: Host distribution "Ubuntu 12.04 LTS"
On 2012-05-03 07:21, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Thursday 03 May 2012 14:56:03 Elvis Dowson wrote:
I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get
a build error when I run the following command:
$ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal
Pseudo is not present but is requ
Thanks for your suggestion. I have not yet tried with kernel modules
but the whole build sequence appears fine and the output is running.
I am hitting a problem thought with step 3
I have this layout (meta-mylayer is parallel to meta-yocto):
meta-mylayer/conf/machine/mymachine.conf
meta-mylayer
Hi,
In my bblayers.conf, I've included the poky-extras/meta-linaro meta
layer.
BBLAYERS ?= " \
/tool/yocto/poky/meta \
/tool/yocto/poky/meta-yocto \
/tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-kernel-dev \
/tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
/tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe \
/tool/yoc
* Remove mercurial as this is no longer needed
* linuxdoc-tools was mentioned twice in the CentOS list
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/documentation/yocto-project-qs/
We no longer support Fedora versions older than 15 so remove this note.
Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton
---
.../yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml | 10 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/documentation/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.xml
b/do
Hi,
When I try to run bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal, it fails to
fetch libcgroup-0.37.1
NOTE: Running task 139 of 305 (ID: 264,
/tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-core/libcgroup/libcgroup_0.37.1.bb,
do_fetch)
NOTE: package libcgroup-0.37.1-r1: task do_fetch: Started
WA
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> /tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
I think you should remove above layer from BBLAYERS
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On 05/03/2012 01:01 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
Dear all,
I'm migrating a project from oe-classic to yocto 1.2.
This goes fairly smoothly. Got some warnings I reported before.
If I build my app it runs fine (with the uclibc from oe-classic that
is already on the board).
Next step was to try t
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-05-03 07:21, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> I saw this checkin yesterday on meta-ti:
> Module: meta-ti
> Branch: refs/tags/v2012.05-yocto1.2
> Tag:ccae351a692bf6fa17a4a1e35b89ff6efcd35c6c
> URL:
> http://arago-project.org/git/meta-t
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> When I try to run bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal, it fails to fetch
> libcgroup-0.37.1
>
> NOTE: Running task 139 of 305 (ID: 264,
> /tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-core/libcgroup/libcgroup_0.37.1.bb,
> do_fetch)
> NO
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> When I try to run bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal, it fails to fetch
> libcgroup-0.37.1
>
> NOTE: Running task 139 of 305 (ID: 264,
> /tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-core/libcgroup/libcgroup_0.37.1.bb,
> do_fetch)
> NO
Hi,
This patch fixes a build issue with meta-xilinx, since util-linux_2.21.bb
recipe has been renamed to util-linux_2.21.1.bb
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
>From 6d5684d44c1eac67e551a98b0751e996470d203c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elvis Dowson
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 20:34:51 +0200
Subject
Hi,
This patch fixes a build issue with meta-xilinx, since util-linux_2.21.bb
recipe has been renamed to util-linux_2.21.1.bb
Best regards,
Elvis Dowson
>From 6d5684d44c1eac67e551a98b0751e996470d203c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Elvis Dowson
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 20:34:51 +0200
Subjec
On 2012-05-03 12:22, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-05-03 07:21, Paul Eggleton wrote:
I saw this checkin yesterday on meta-ti:
Module: meta-ti
Branch: refs/tags/v2012.05-yocto1.2
Tag: ccae351a692bf6fa17a4a1e35b89ff6efcd35c6c
URL:
http://arago-pr
Hi,
I get a bunch of warnings asking me to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as
-systemd.
WARNING: /tool/yocto/meta-ti/recipes-misc/payload/bonescript.bb: it is
recommended to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as -systemd
WARNING:
/tool/yocto/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/networkmanager/networkman
Hi,
How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
For example, if I set
# kernel provider
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3"
and try to build my machine, I get the following errors:
ERROR: Function failed: Fetcher failure for URL: 'file://defconfig'. Unable t
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
>
> For example, if I set
>
> # kernel provider
> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3"
>
> and try to build my machine, I get the following errors:
>
> ERROR: Function
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:21:40PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 03 May 2012 14:56:03 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> > I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get
> > a build error when I run the following command:
> >
> > $ bitbake -c fetchall core-image-minimal
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:39:17AM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-05-03 07:21, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >On Thursday 03 May 2012 14:56:03 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> >> I've setup and configured an Ubuntu-12.04 LTS 64-bit system, and I get
> >>a build error when I run the following command:
> >>
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 01:07:06PM -0600, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-05-03 12:22, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On May 3, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> >
> >>On 2012-05-03 07:21, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >>I saw this checkin yesterday on meta-ti:
> >>Module: meta-ti
> >>Branch: refs/ta
On 12-05-03 05:42 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
For example, if I set
# kernel provider
PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-omap3"
and try to build my machine, I get the following
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-05-03 05:42 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> >
> >>How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
> >>
> >>For example, if I set
> >>
> >># kernel provider
> >>P
On 12-05-03 06:03 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-05-03 05:42 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
Hi,
On May 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
How can I specify a machine defconfig for a linux recipe?
For example, if I set
# ker
On 12-05-01 06:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
This somehow missed the 3.0 to 3.2 update. It is required for networking
on the sys940x BSP. Please apply to standard/base and derived branches.
The somehow .. is that I thought this made 3.2, and it didn't. This is
merged
here, and when I get back to
On 12-05-01 06:13 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
Please apply to linux-yocto-3.2 meta branch.
The following changes since commit b14a08f5c7b469a5077c10942f4e1aec171faa9d:
meta: Clean up BSPs kernel config (2012-04-17 16:04:15 -0400)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.infradead.org
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:02:08AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> > /tool/yocto/poky-extras/meta-linaro \
>
> I think you should remove above layer from BBLAYERS
I agree - that one is unofficial and unmaintained. Linaro is working on the
official
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 09:11:49PM +0200, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> Hi,
> I get a bunch of warnings asking me to set SYSTEMD_PACKAGES as
> -systemd.
You get those from the recipes that inherit systemd.bbclass, but not set
SYSTEMD_PACKAGES with ${PN}-systemd for some reason. Sometimes it's wron
On 05/03/2012 03:29 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-05-01 06:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> This somehow missed the 3.0 to 3.2 update. It is required for networking
>> on the sys940x BSP. Please apply to standard/base and derived branches.
>
> The somehow .. is that I thought this made 3.2, and
48 matches
Mail list logo
