On 11/9/10 12:12 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-08 7:41 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Out of curiosity. What's the logic/requirement behind this
change ? Since we don't have a 'supported' 2.6.36 kernel, using
Richard,
More Distro reviewed, build and basic testing. This is the new script
output from Darren's pull request.
Sau!
Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git
Branch: distro/master
Browse:
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=distro/master
For RP: contri
I'm working on swabber support, and as part of that need to enable running
builds in strace. The code for this is in josh's poky-contrib.
For anyone else who is looking at this, various packages failed to build with
-jN (with N>1). My theory is that running these builds under strace changes
This is quite helpful, as we have been discussing this exact topic this week.
Maybe capture this in Bugzilla? (Not at my computer at the moment or would
help). Thanks again.
Davest
Sent from my Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: Alex deVries [mailto:alex.devr...@windriver.com]
Sent
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 09:18 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 11/9/10 12:12 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > On 10-11-08 7:41 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> >> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
> >>
> >> Out of curiosity. What's the logic/requirement behind this
> >> change ? Since
On 10-11-09 6:31 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 09:18 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 11/9/10 12:12 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 10-11-08 7:41 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Out of curiosity. What's the logic/requirement behi
Hi, Richard,
I just had a quick investigation on disk space occupation for Yocto linux.
Here are some findings and thoughts.
I built poky-image-minimal based on poky green release and yocto-0.9 release,
within the build directory, I dumped the tmp dir size:
Tmp dir size:
Green: 7.4G
Yocto-0.9: 2
Attendees:
PRC: Dave, RP, PRC Distro Team,
US: Beth, Scott, Nitin, Saul
Opens: no opens
4 milestones
M2: 6 sprints
M3 : 6 sprints
around a week of sprint
sprint A is bit longer
M4: stabilizing & bug fixing
Release: on Apr 1st (April Fool's Day), Contingency Apr 15th
release venue: Linux
I'm trying to build the MPC8135E RDB and have the following setup in
conf/local.conf:
# Uncomment and set to allow bitbake to execute multiple tasks at once.
# For a quadcore, BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "4", PARALLEL_MAKE = "-j 4" would
# be appropriate.
BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "16"
# Also, make can be pass
Why does the meta/conf/machine/mpc8315e-rdb.conf list TARGET_FPU as SPE. This
isn't correct for an MPC8313 SoC.
- k
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
10 matches
Mail list logo