On 17 September 2012 17:32, Elvis Dowson wrote:
> MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED = "" has not effect
Set MACHINE_FEATURES_BACKFILL_CONSIDERED = "hwclock", not "". It's
value is a list of features that are being backfilled, and you need to
declare that you've considered adding it to the fea
Hi Paul,
On Sep 16, 2012, at 10:31 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Sunday 16 September 2012 20:09:10 Elvis Dowson wrote:
>> On 09/16/2012 07:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>> On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Elvis Dowson
> wrote:
So I added busybox-1.19.4 recipe back into my poky master branch, an
On Sunday 16 September 2012 20:09:10 Elvis Dowson wrote:
> On 09/16/2012 07:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Elvis Dowson
wrote:
> >> So I added busybox-1.19.4 recipe back into my poky master branch, and the
> >> resulting size of the busybox-1.19.4 /bin/busybox or /bi
On 09/16/2012 07:54 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
So I added busybox-1.19.4 recipe back into my poky master branch, and the
resulting size of the busybox-1.19.4 /bin/busybox or /bin/sh executable is
604.2 kb.
make sure that .config of busybox has n
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Elvis Dowson wrote:
>
>
> So I added busybox-1.19.4 recipe back into my poky master branch, and the
> resulting size of the busybox-1.19.4 /bin/busybox or /bin/sh executable is
> 604.2 kb.
make sure that .config of busybox has not changed even if you have
same
Hi,
How can I do a dependency walk for the busybox recipe?
I've added gcc-4.5 recipe support and eglibc-2.13 support against the latest
poky master branch. The core-image-minimal image works for my powerpc440
soft-float target, from an older commit id, prior to the gcc toolchain rework,
