Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-19 Thread Jeff Osier-Mixon
It also occurs to me that a source for the confusion might be that there is more than one build process going on with BitBake. It is used both to create packages and to install them into a rootfs in order to create an image. Thus, the workflow looks something like this, starting from the point of d

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-19 Thread Jeff Osier-Mixon
I'm afraid "source tarball" doesn't quite work, as not all are required to be tarballs, e.g. if something is in a git repo or in a local CVS repo. Can it be true that there is no single term that refers to the collection of pieces that, when built, create a discrete package? On Wed, Sep 19, 2012

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-19 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
hat limit their work exclusively to creating indices. Good feedback! Thanks, Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Brian Lloyd Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 8:51 AM To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yoc

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-19 Thread Brian Lloyd
I would like to point out Yocto's own documentation uses it for two separate items, which is the point I was making. Neither of which are source tarballs It is a product produced by Yocto. It is the items to be installed from the host system. That may be right, but if so, we can't say that

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-19 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: > Anyone have a good term for "source packages"? Source tarball? ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-18 Thread Jeff Osier-Mixon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote: >> Most of my hits for such an item >> discuss the packages I will need to install in my host distribution so I >> can use the yocto project (not surprised, the danger of a term as vagu

Re: [yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-18 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Brian Lloyd wrote: > Most of my hits for such an item > discuss the packages I will need to install in my host distribution so I > can use the yocto project (not surprised, the danger of a term as vague > as packages). In bitbake/yocto/OE/etc. the term "packages"

[yocto] All incompassing documentation

2012-09-18 Thread Brian Lloyd
I took a look at the mega-manual for the first time after hearing mention of it in the meeting. >From a new user perspective, it seems a step backwards. While everything may be there, it has the needle in the haystack feeling. The only way to find something is to search for it, but what search t