nt, but it works.
Regards,
NOrman
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Norman Stetter
SW ENWICKLUNG EMBEDDED SYSTEMS
Garz & Fricke GmbH
21079 Hamburg
Direct: +49 40 791899 - 477
Fax: +49 40 791899 - 39
norman.stet...@garz-fricke.com
www.garz-fricke.com
WE MAKE IT YOURS!
Sitz der Gesells
Is there no way to simply force bitbake to only build the packages I want,
ignoring dependencies? We used to build the image like this before, using
PTXDist.
Everything else seems to be a dirty hack.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Norman Stetter
SW ENWICKLUNG EMBEDDED SYSTEMS
Garz
mounted file system.
Norman
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Norman Stetter
SW ENWICKLUNG EMBEDDED SYSTEMS
Garz & Fricke GmbH
21079 Hamburg
Direct: +49 40 791899 - 477
Fax: +49 40 791899 - 39
norman.stet...@garz-fricke.com
www.garz-fricke.com<http://www.garz-fricke.com/>
WE MAK
testing time is critical.
I now have it running with the recipe I posted in the first mail in this
thread. But I still can’t get rid of busybox in my python image.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Norman Stetter
SW ENWICKLUNG EMBEDDED SYSTEMS
Garz & Fricke GmbH
21079 Hamburg
Direct: +4
Hi Ross,
thanks for clarifying that there are no dependencies between images.
Von: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Gesendet: Thursday, May 23, 2019 2:15 PM
An: Norman Stetter
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Betreff: Re: [yocto] Building single package as image, respecting dependencies
from within this
build process pack all python3 files into an image? If I were to pursue this
method, any suggestions on how to separate the python3 files from the rest of
my rootfs, including the necessary dependencies?
Any advice and idea is much appreciated.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
sesinfo finished
ERROR: Function failed: do_licensesinfo
So it looks like the invoked 'dnf' can't open a file due to permission issues.
But I never experienced any problems during my regular builds, which obviously
also use 'image_list_installed_packages'.
Does someone