Re: [yocto] Yocto Thud - /lib64 link - Build Failure

2018-11-28 Thread ChenQi
This is because prelink_image is also in IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND. meta/classes/image-prelink.bbclass:IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND_append_libc-glibc = " prelink_setup; prelink_image; " And as it's using _append, it will be after your 'symlink_lib64'. Maybe using IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND_append = "

Re: [yocto] Yocto Thud - /lib64 link - Build Failure

2018-11-28 Thread Khem Raj
Can you try postprocess instead of preprocess On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 4:10 PM Chuck Wolber wrote: > Background: I have an image that works in pyro. I am migrating the image > to thud. > > Some of the add-on code to our image requires the /lib64 directory (in > particular the VirtualBox Additions

[yocto] Yocto Thud - /lib64 link - Build Failure

2018-11-28 Thread Chuck Wolber
Background: I have an image that works in pyro. I am migrating the image to thud. Some of the add-on code to our image requires the /lib64 directory (in particular the VirtualBox Additions). I have proven that a simple symlink (/lib -> /lib64) fixes the problem. This symlink was being applied with

Re: [yocto] x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?

2018-11-28 Thread Richard Weinberger
Richard, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:42 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > But it seems that building and SDK is currently broken/disabled: > > > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?id=e153efde9754a650e555f46cba09680baabd7d7e > > I see a bug was opened for this but its not valid and th

Re: [yocto] am335x evmsk screen init:id"00" respawning too fast disabled for 5 minutes yocto sumo

2018-11-28 Thread Josef Holzmayr
Howdy! On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 03:50:02PM +, n.stanisavlje...@polycaptil.fr wrote: > Hello everybody > > here is an introduction of my situation : > > I build a custom board from schematic of sitara AM335x-evmsk starter kit. > I succeed to make a custom OS with yocto (krogoth version) and to

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> I'm not sure what the request is here. To ask all the repository > maintainers *to add tags* so you don't return a fatal on git describe? Not quite. To add tags, yes, NOT for git describe (it is just a test). Rather for git log (using tags). Thank you, Zoran ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Beth Flanagan
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:18 AM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > Hello YOCTO people, > > I would like to use standard git tool while using all the Yocto > layers. NOT only Poky repository (which, I believe, works all the way > with git tools), but as much as possible with other github proprietary >

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
hey Zoran! On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 7:01 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > But again this is very different from the initial problem you are > > reporting, which is just a misunderstanding of git tags and commits. > > Nicolas, > > Your problem is that you are too emotional. Period. I clearly Fi

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> But again this is very different from the initial problem you are > reporting, which is just a misunderstanding of git tags and commits. Nicolas, Your problem is that you are too emotional. Period. I clearly explained what my problem is. For some YOCTO github repos, certain git commands DO NOT

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:53 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > This is what your opinion is. Which seems to be vastly overestimating its > > own importance. > > I do not think you understood what I am trying to advertise. The > unification. In other words: > If I use kernel.org, I use git tool.

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
OK, I rest my case. Seems, that I am the only one here using git describe, and git log using tags. Could be. ;-) Thank you all, Zoran ___ On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:53 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > This is what your opinion is. Which seems to be vastly overestimating its > > own import

[yocto] Flashing Yocto Images using Clonezilla

2018-11-28 Thread Mohammad, Jamal M
Hi Guys, We are using meta-intel layer to generate .hddimg. We can flash the generated .hddimg using Bootable Thumb Drive, but using this mechanism in manufacturing is not a good solution. We need some way to flash the Yocto Image using clonezilla, as hddimg is not recognized by clonezilla.

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> This is what your opinion is. Which seems to be vastly overestimating its own > importance. I do not think you understood what I am trying to advertise. The unification. In other words: If I use kernel.org, I use git tool. If I use YOCTO Poky, I would like to use git tool. For all YOCTO repos,

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
hey, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 1:42 PM Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > > What can you not do with Yocto's git repositories? > > Please, refer to my initial email. Not referring to Poky, I guess, the > Poky repo is equivalent to kernel.org. In other words, everything with > it can be done with git to

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Burton, Ross
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 12:42, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > > What can you not do with Yocto's git repositories? > > Please, refer to my initial email. Not referring to Poky, I guess, the > Poky repo is equivalent to kernel.org. In other words, everything with > it can be done with git tool. > > I

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
> What can you not do with Yocto's git repositories? Please, refer to my initial email. Not referring to Poky, I guess, the Poky repo is equivalent to kernel.org. In other words, everything with it can be done with git tool. I am referring to many others, associated with github. Maybe it is ONLY

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Enrico Scholz
Zoran Stojsavljevic writes: > On the other note, repo is GOOGLE tool. Promoted by them. Most of the > ARM followers (such as Toradex) use repo tool. fwiw, I suggest to use just the plain 'git submodule'. It works perfectly to build a BSP and uses a native git workflow. E.g. look at

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Zoran, On 28/11/18 12:00, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > Hello Stefano, > > I am (almost) perfectly aligned with kernel.org, and I (personally) > decided to use git. Since I start understanding importance of Linus. > Linux officers and their Linux philosophy. Each tool is thought to solve a spe

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Josef Holzmayr
Hello Zoran, On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:00:22PM +0100, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > I am (almost) perfectly aligned with kernel.org, and I (personally) > decided to use git. Since I start understanding importance of Linus. > Linux officers and their Linux philosophy. You are free to choose your w

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Burton, Ross
On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 at 11:22, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > Since with git I can do almost whatever with kernel.org (and > derivatives, all known distros) git... Very opposite to YOCTO. And I > like git, It is VERY powerful. Maybe I finally started to understand > the tool. What can you not do wit

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Again, I see git as superior tool. But I can speak only in my name/this is only me. Since with git I can do almost whatever with kernel.org (and derivatives, all known distros) git... Very opposite to YOCTO. And I like git, It is VERY powerful. Maybe I finally started to understand the tool. AS o

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Burton, Ross
Personally I don't see why there needs to be One Blessed Tool to manage keeping repositories in sync. There's lots of alternatives, none of them is obviously superior to the others, and none of them have any requirements on the repositories that they're managing. If you want a repository manageme

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello Stefano, I am (almost) perfectly aligned with kernel.org, and I (personally) decided to use git. Since I start understanding importance of Linus. Linux officers and their Linux philosophy. Now... Answers to your email. KAS (Siemens developed tool by Jan Kiszka and his crew) is the supplemen

Re: [yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Stefano Babic
Hi Zoran, On 28/11/18 10:17, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > Hello YOCTO people, > > I would like to use standard git tool while using all the Yocto > layers. NOT only Poky repository (which, I believe, works all the way > with git tools), but as much as possible with other github proprietary > repo

[yocto] Git tool/command problems with YOCTO Open Source repos

2018-11-28 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Hello YOCTO people, I would like to use standard git tool while using all the Yocto layers. NOT only Poky repository (which, I believe, works all the way with git tools), but as much as possible with other github proprietary repos and layers. Since I am not able to execute git commands using some

Re: [yocto] x86_64 kernel with i586 userland plus SDK?

2018-11-28 Thread Richard Purdie
Hi, On Tue, 2018-11-27 at 22:46 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > I have a hard time understanding how to build a distro with x86_64 > kernel, i586 userland > and an SDK for that. > In the beginning I assumed and have been told on IRC that multilib is > the way to go. > > But it seems that build