[yocto] dynamic layer dependencies in meta-security

2017-07-18 Thread Patrick Ohly
Hello Armin! I'm trying to use the latest meta-security master in refkit. Refkit runs yocto-compat-layer.py against its own layers, which then pulls in meta-security as one of the dependencies. That's where I am hitting a snag: INFO: Detected layers: INFO: meta-refkit: LayerType.DISTRO, /fast/wor

Re: [yocto] SELinux with Busybox on morty

2017-07-18 Thread Justin Clacherty
Hi Joe, Is this something you or one of the other meta-selinux devs are able to help out with or is it more of an upstream question? Cheers, Justin. > On 17 Jul 2017, at 4:57 pm, Marco Ostini wrote: > > > Hi All, > > At the moment I'm attempting to prepare a VM of morty with SELinux runnin

Re: [yocto] FFplay question ?

2017-07-18 Thread Markus Volk
Dear Riko, ffplay needs sdl as dependency, guess that's your problem regards, Markus On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:19:24 +0800 Riko Ho wrote: > Dear Yocto Members, > > I tried to compile FFplay with FFMpeg, but I can not get it ? > > What should I change on this code ? > > Here's on ffmpeg_3.3.bb

Re: [yocto] python3-jinja2 missing package dependency

2017-07-18 Thread Tim Orling
Can you submit a patch please? Thank you! On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:15 PM Craig McQueen wrote: > For the python3-jinja2 package in meta-openembedded meta-python, it should > also have a dependency on python3-numbers. > > I'm not sure if this dependency also applies for python-jinja2 package. > I'

[yocto] FFplay question ?

2017-07-18 Thread Riko Ho
Dear Yocto Members, I tried to compile FFplay with FFMpeg, but I can not get it ? What should I change on this code ? Here's on ffmpeg_3.3.bb : === EXTRA_OECONF = " \ --disable-stripping \ --enable-pic \ --enable-shared \ --enable-pthreads \ --enable-ffplay \ " Thank y

[yocto] python3-jinja2 missing package dependency

2017-07-18 Thread Craig McQueen
For the python3-jinja2 package in meta-openembedded meta-python, it should also have a dependency on python3-numbers. I'm not sure if this dependency also applies for python-jinja2 package. I'm just using the Python 3 package. -- Craig McQueen -- _

[yocto] Upgrading to Yocto 1.8 : Kernel module issue due to missing work-shared//kernel-source

2017-07-18 Thread Koehler, Yannick
Hi guys, Question for you, we were using Yocto 1.6, and I am proceeding to upgrade to 2.2, going one release at a time. Upgrade to 1.7 was with no problem, but 1.8 seems to have an issue due to missing work-shared//kernel-source folder (aka STAGING_KERNEL_DIR or KERNEL_SRC). The folder appear

Re: [yocto] Proper way to rename a downloaded file in SRC_URI

2017-07-18 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hi Jimi, On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 6:40:52 PM CEST Jimi Damon wrote: > I have a recipe that I built for building jzmq, however one of the > issues I have is with the naming of the release files from the github site. > > Unlike czmq which has downloads ( zip and tar.gz ) that are named > czmq-${P

Re: [yocto] Proper way to rename a downloaded file in SRC_URI

2017-07-18 Thread Leonardo Sandoval
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 09:40 -0700, Jimi Damon wrote: > I have a recipe that I built for building jzmq, however one of the > issues I have is with the naming of the release files from the github > site. > > Unlike czmq which has downloads ( zip and tar.gz ) that are named > czmq-${PV}.tar.gz, the d

[yocto] Proper way to rename a downloaded file in SRC_URI

2017-07-18 Thread Jimi Damon
I have a recipe that I built for building jzmq, however one of the issues I have is with the naming of the release files from the github site. Unlike czmq which has downloads ( zip and tar.gz ) that are named czmq-${PV}.tar.gz, the downloads from jzmq are just called v${PV}.tar.gz. How can I

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 5/5] buildset-config.yocto-qa: Add intel-corei7-64-daft buildset

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
This buildset is for support running sanity tests over a DUT like Minnowboard for the moment only builds core-image-sato, there is a need to make it configurable. Also the listo of the available devices are fixed into the UI as parameters. [YOCTO #10604] Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón --- buildse

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 3/5] autobuilder/buildsteps: Add DaftGetDevices step

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
This buildstep will copy the devices configuration from the worker and read it, in order to get daft ip an ssh port, to use later in RunSanityTests [YOCTO #10604] Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón Signed-off-by: Edwin Plauchu --- config/autobuilder.conf.example| 3 + .../autobu

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 4/5] autobuilder/buildsteps: Add DAFTFlash buildstep

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
This will execute daft flash cycle without reboot and prepare the dut for sanity tests. [YOCTO #10604] Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón Signed-off-by: Edwin Plauchu --- config/autobuilder.conf.example| 1 + .../autobuilder/buildsteps/DaftFlash.py| 39 +++

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 2/5] buildsteps/RunSanityTests: Add support for simpleremote target

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
The testimage class supports a simpleremote target specifying the server and target ip to run tests over SSH. The main usage of this will in conjunction with the DAFT to make tests on real HW. [YOCTO #10604] Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón --- .../site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/RunSanityTest

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 0/5] Enable DAFT support into the AB

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
This v3 address the following issues, * Uses BuildImages property instead of uppercase to avoid confusion with BB variables. * Refactor code to get DUT configuration in lib/daft.py. * Remove the sudo usage when executing daft flash. Also the changes can be reviewed at, http://git.yoctoproject.

[yocto] [yocto-autobuilder][PATCHv3 1/5] buildsteps/BuildImages: Setproperty BuildImages

2017-07-18 Thread Aníbal Limón
In certain situations is need to know what images was built for example the DAFT executes flashing over certain image. [YOCTO #10604] Signed-off-by: Aníbal Limón --- lib/python2.7/site-packages/autobuilder/buildsteps/BuildImages.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/pyth

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] fetch2/__init_.py removed bb.error which caused exit code 1

2017-07-18 Thread Leonardo Sandoval
you need to send it to openembedde-core mailing list and use git-send-email to submit your patch. More info on the link below http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/How_to_submit_a_patch_to_OpenEmbedded Leo On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 15:43 +0200, Paulo Neves wrote: > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermai

Re: [yocto] [Recipe reporting system] Upgradable recipe name list

2017-07-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:03 AM, wrote: > This mail was sent out by Recipe reporting system. > > This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers > believe some of them needn't to upgrade at this time, they can fill > RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON in respective recipe file to

[yocto] [Recipe reporting system] Upgradable recipe name list

2017-07-18 Thread recipe-report
This mail was sent out by Recipe reporting system. This message list those recipes which need to be upgraded. If maintainers believe some of them needn't to upgrade at this time, they can fill RECIPE_NO_UPDATE_REASON in respective recipe file to ignore this remainder until newer upstream version w

[yocto] [PATCH] fetch2/__init_.py removed bb.error which caused exit code 1

2017-07-18 Thread Paulo Neves
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-September/069448.html Workaround to avoid exit 1 status. The reason it happens is that there are 2 missions the state cache uses the normal fetcher to get its's stuff and it is acceptable for it to fail. On the other h

[yocto] [PATCH] staging.bbclass: Refactored sysroot_stage_dir* functions.

2017-07-18 Thread Paulo Neves
staging.bbclass: Refactored sysroot_stage_dir* functions. Removed sysroot_stage_libdir because it just forwarded the arguments to sysroot_stage_libdir with no other function. git grep for sysroot_stage_libdir did not show any recipe appending or overrriding sysroot_stage_libdir.

[yocto] How to build a same package twice with different configurations for same MACHINE?

2017-07-18 Thread Ngọc Thi Huỳnh
Hi everyone, In my system, I want to build two images: - main-image : contains the real system with applications and stuff. - initial-flasher-image : contains a swu (swupdate file) for the first flashing. The images are built in this sequence: main-image > swu > initial-flasher-image Both images

Re: [yocto] Problem building kernel FIT image with initramfs

2017-07-18 Thread Martin Townsend
Sorry hit send before finishing email. So it looks like do_install and do_deploy are expecting fitImage-${INITRAMFS_IMAGE} so is this renaming required anymore? and if so is this a problem with the freescale kernel? Many Thanks, Martin. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Martin Townsend wrote: >

[yocto] Problem building kernel FIT image with initramfs

2017-07-18 Thread Martin Townsend
Hi, Using Yocto 2.3 (pyro) I was trying to create a FIT image with the 4.9 linux-fslc kernel and an initramfs image. following the instructions it failed during do_bundle_initramfs. After debugging I found that it moves the fitImage file to fitImage.bak and then runs a second pass and renames th

Re: [yocto] Build core2 (i686) U-Boot for a core-i7 (amd64) image

2017-07-18 Thread Ferry Toth
Op Mon, 17 Jul 2017 22:49:51 -0400, schreef Khem Raj: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Ferry Toth > wrote: >> On edison U-Boot is 32 bit. I'm building a 64 bit kernel + rootfs. >> >> The only recipy that fails is U-Boot with: >> undefined reference to `__normal___udivdi3' >> >> > this means gcc