Sorry hit send before finishing email.
So it looks like do_install and do_deploy are expecting
fitImage-${INITRAMFS_IMAGE} so is this renaming required anymore? and
if so is this a problem with the freescale kernel?
Many Thanks,
Martin.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Martin Townsend
<mtownsend1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Using Yocto 2.3 (pyro) I was trying to create a FIT image with the 4.9
> linux-fslc kernel and an initramfs image. following the instructions
> it failed during do_bundle_initramfs. After debugging I found that it
> moves the fitImage file to fitImage.bak and then runs a second pass
> and renames the new fitImage to fitImage.initramfs but fitImage is
> never created on this second pass but fitImage-${INITRAMFS_IMAGE} is
> created.
>
> If I comment out the line that does this rename every builds fine
>
> echo "Resoring Kernel Image"
> for tp in $tmp_path ; do
> type=`echo $tp|cut -d "#" -f 1`
> linkpath=`echo $tp|cut -d "#" -f 2`
> realpath=`echo $tp|cut -d "#" -f 3`
> if [ -n "$realpath" ]; then
> mv -f $realpath $realpath.initramfs
> mv -f $realpath.bak $realpath
> ln -sf $linkpath.initramfs ${B}/${KERNEL_OUTPUT_DIR}/$type.initramfs
> else
>
> #mv -f ${KERNEL_OUTPUT_DIR}/$type ${KERNEL_OUTPUT_DIR}/$type.initramfs
> mv -f ${KERNEL_OUTPUT_DIR}/$type.bak ${KERNEL_OUTPUT_DIR}/$type
> fi
> done
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
