On 13-01-28 11:16 AM, Daniel Kenji Morgan wrote:
Sorry to bring up an old post, but I haven't managed to find information in the
mail archives and bugzilla on how the issue stands as of today.
The post I am referring to is as follows:
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/2011-December
Attendees:
Illeana, Nitin, Amit, Richard, ScottR, Belen, BruceA, TomZ, LaurentiuP,
Corneliu, Mark, Björn, Kevin, Saul, Ross, AlexG, JessicaZ, BogdanM, DarrenH,
SongL.
Agenda:
* Opens collection - 5 min (Song)
* Yocto Project 1.3.1 status - 10 min (Ross)
- Ross: nothing new. We should be
Thanks. Sounds like it would be useful to document this variable.
From: kerg...@gmail.com [mailto:kerg...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Larson
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:10 PM
To: Rifenbark, Scott M
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY
On Tue, Jan 2
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M <
scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com> wrote:
> I can't seem to find any information on this variable other than what was
> offered in a bug (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3662)
> filed against some stuff in the glossary in general.
Good information... thanks!
>-Original Message-
>From: Trevor Woerner [mailto:twoer...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:06 PM
>To: Rifenbark, Scott M
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: [yocto] BB_DANGLINGAPPENDS_WARNONLY
>
>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rifenbark, Sc
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M
wrote:
> Can anyone out there offer more information on this variable? Wondering
> whether this should be documented in the glossary.
By default bitbake will throw an error if there exists a *.bbappend
recipe for which there is no correspondin
I can't seem to find any information on this variable other than what was
offered in a bug (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3662) filed
against some stuff in the glossary in general. The information provided there
by Robert P. J. Day says it is handy when layers get out of syn
Kevin,
Thanks for the fixes. I cherry-picked them from your contrib area and they are
now in yocto-docs/master.
Scott
>-Original Message-
>From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-
>boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Strasser
>Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:06 P
On 13-01-29 06:24 AM, stephen.lawre...@renesas.com wrote:
Bruce Ashfield wrote on 28/01/2013
18:56:02:
Why is the SRC_URI containing the additional patches applied when
referenced directly in the bb file,
but not when referenced in an include or scc file?
Keeping the question isolated to jus
When adding for example file system generating tools like
"mkfs.cramfs" or "mkfs.ubifs" to the SDK, these will be installed into
the "${prefix_nativesdk}/sbin" directory, but the generated
environment-setup script sets a PATH that includes /bin only.
Add a new definition of "sbindir_nativesdk" and
Bruce Ashfield wrote on 28/01/2013
18:56:02:
> Why is the SRC_URI containing the additional patches applied when
> referenced directly in the bb file,
> but not when referenced in an include or scc file?
> >>>
> >>> Keeping the question isolated to just the patch on the SRC_URI is
11 matches
Mail list logo
