[yocto] cargo does not build currently

Hi all Some problem with the build of cargo just popped up. I am doing currently builds on the master branches. It turns out after a sync of my sources cargo does not build anymore. It spits weird error messages that it cannot find the crate for libc: can't find crate for `libc` Somehow thing

Re: [yocto] PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine

🙈️ It was an error in the MACHINEOVERRIDES assignment. Sorry for the noise. Am Freitag, dem 07.02.2025 um 11:50 + schrieb David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org: > Hi all > I have a weird problem with my image that just popped up - I have a > custom machine (called bf133) that pro

[yocto] PROVIDES virtual/kernel but was skipped: incompatible with machine

Hi all I have a weird problem with my image that just popped up - I have a custom machine (called bf133) that provides the kernel recipe (as linux-bf133) wherein I specify the the machine as compatible. For some reason though bitbake spits an error that the kernel is incompatible with that machine

Re: [yocto] imx-boot / u-boot for iMX95

nd effort! Am Mittwoch, dem 05.02.2025 um 15:38 + schrieb David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org: > Thanks a lot! I will try that tomorrow and see what I can find out. > > Am Mittwoch, dem 05.02.2025 um 15:15 +0100 schrieb Gyorgy Sarvari: > > One generic thought, which may

Re: [yocto] imx-boot / u-boot for iMX95

etween the recipes. These signatures supposed to > contain most (all?) relevant functions, variables and their values > used > for the task. At the first time I'd especially concentrate on > variable > names containing "BOOT", and maybe on the compiler flags. > &g

Re: [yocto] imx-boot / u-boot for iMX95

Thank you for your inputs! I can see that both imx-boot binaries begin with the same hex content, the tenth byte whatsoever is 01 in my build and 00 in the build from Variscite. Then from the 23rd byte some more differences and then the same bytes again. Lots of blocks with the same content but sti

[yocto] imx-boot / u-boot for iMX95

Hi all We received an iMX95 Dart evalkit board from Variscite and I am preparing our bsp layer for the machine that will be derived from that board. Now I wanted to integrate u-boot and imx-boot into our image and went ahead and took a look at Variscites layers - they already provide some setup for

Re: [yocto] kernel append file with dts in SRC_URI and subdir

rieb Quentin Schulz: > Hi David, > > On 1/27/25 12:12 PM, David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to figure out why the following snippet of a kernel > > .bbappend file does not populate the cus

Re: [yocto] kernel append file with dts in SRC_URI and subdir

it doesn't check if the content conflicts or not :) > > On 27.01.25 15:33, David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > Ah I see. That's weird though, as the name is unique, it shouldn't > > collide with any existing file. But adding as a patch sounds > > reas

Re: [yocto] kernel append file with dts in SRC_URI and subdir

ng, it is possible that your dts > file > overwritten by the actual kernel source. > > Try adding it as a patch? > > On 27.01.25 12:12, David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to figure out why the following snippet of a

[yocto] kernel append file with dts in SRC_URI and subdir

Hi I am trying to figure out why the following snippet of a kernel .bbappend file does not populate the custom device tree source file in the proper location: FILESEXTRAPATHS:prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:"

[yocto] [linux-yocto][poky][master][PATCH] module.bbclass: enhance KBUILD_EXTRA_SYMBOLS retrieval

Kernel packages may not always use the kernel-module- prefix. However, those listed in DEPENDS will consistently add Module.symvers to the STAGING_INCDIR. Signed-off-by: Daniel Chaves --- meta/classes-recipe/module.bbclass | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) dif

Re: [yocto] vmlinux has relocations in .text

s up. Does this now mean that my build ignores the QA of textrel for all packages? Am Dienstag, dem 06.08.2024 um 10:58 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj: On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 2:49 AM David Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org<http://lists.yoctoproject.org> mailto:vrag...@lists.yoctoproject.

[yocto] vmlinux has relocations in .text

Hi everybody I am updating my setup for a custom system and I'm getting an error now with the kernel. Everything works until packaging of the kernel, I now get the error that the kernel image contains relocations in .text: ERROR: linux-bf133-6.6.44-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: kernel-vmlinux: ELF

Re: [yocto] Missing patch status (upstream status)

Daniel via lists.yoctoproject.org<http://lists.yoctoproject.org> mailto:vrag...@lists.yoctoproject.org>> wrote: Hi all I realized that my project does not build anymore. Now a patch status is required - but even when I put it in (the patch status), the error does not go

[yocto] Missing patch status (upstream status)

Hi all I realized that my project does not build anymore. Now a patch status is required - but even when I put it in (the patch status), the error does not go away: ERROR: bootcommander-1.0-r0 do_patch: QA Issue: Missing Upstream-Status in patch /mnt/data/yocto/bf133/meta-bf133/recipes-bsp/bootco