Fix is already merged
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to n
Public bug reported:
Networking-OVN's gate broke [0] after [1] was merged due to the missing
definition of provider_network_attribute_updates_supported in [2]. In my
opinion, it would serve a better purpose to have this definition in the
base class itself.
[0]http://paste.openstack.org/show/7490
The bug is invalid now as related error message was already removed
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1712318
Tit
d.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-fwaas-
extension-dscp
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
** Tags added: fwaas
--
You received
The fix has been released in stable/mitaka.
If anything is pending, please update the bug again.
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs
This issue is invalid.
However, the lack of firewall_policy_id was fixed in
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370731/
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neu
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1721063
Title:
vulnerability in dnsmasq
Status in neutron:
Won't Fix
Status in Op
Public bug reported:
As per [1],[2] , there have been some vulnerability issue in dnsmasq.
The same have been fixed in dnsmasq version 2.78
In order to avoid the vulnerabilities, it would be advisable to update dnsmasq
to version 2.78
[1]:
https://security.googleblog.com/2017/10/behind-masq-yet-
Public bug reported:
Please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1715395/comments/4
for more information about this issue
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee
The issue was fixed with MariaDB 10.1.X.
I think we can close this issue, unless it pops up again.
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpa
Great, so stop using MariaDB 10.2.X and enjoy :P
On a serious note, thanks for pointing this issue out. I think however,
the global-requirements of Openstack should mention this somewhere,
IIUC.
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification be
Marking this as invalid, to allow tracking the bug from 1505627
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you
://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fwaas/2017/fwaas.2017-08-15-14.00.log.html#l-147
[3]: http://paste.openstack.org/show/619004/
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ree
The fix has been merged in another commit
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694363
Title:
Tempest test f
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Opinion => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699706
Title:
Updation of shared firewall-policy with non shared firewall-rule
Duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1699706
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699708
Title:
Updation
error which is expected by tempest
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Tags added: fwaas
** Changed in: neutron
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
** Project changed: neutron => python-openstackclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1692413
Title:
openstack-client does not display projects when user lists security
quot;Public" attribute of FWaaS v2 to
"Shared".
FwaaS v1 is Out of Scope for this bug
[1]:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fwaas/2017/fwaas.2017-03-21-14.00.log.html#l-151
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
Patch up for review : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441912/
** Project changed: neutron => octavia
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1657089
Title:
[RFE]Add bandwidth_li
Cedric's fix closed this issue, but it seems to have been reopen by the
automated script.
Closing this issue
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Cedric Brandily (cbrandily)
--
You received this bug notification because
Public bug reported:
Issue:
While executing tox -v e py27 on a patch set, I found the following issue:
http://paste.openstack.org/show/601800/
Expected Result: No warning logs should be generated when loading only
definitions from neutron-lib as they do not have Class name which an extension
Letting it expire as it doesnt have a major value add
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640757
Title:
Parameter
Public bug reported:
Neutron Firewalls currently support ICMP, TCP and UDP protocols, while
they can be easily extended to support other protocols ( like SCTP, DCCP
etc).
This RFE is intended to track the same
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee
Thanks.
Yes, this is an issue with the NeutronClient, but not in neutron.
Additional Finding : OpenstackClient lacks -default-quotas option from [1].
[1]:
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/a0e0e8b6686b847a4963a6aa6a3224b5768544e6/neutron/api/v2/attributes.py#L239
** Project changed: neu
The reason why this is so , is because the shell characters are being
evaluated [1] when passed as an input to the neutronclient. You can try
the same experiment with any other client ( like Openstack Client) or
any other CLI as well.[2]
And, from Neutron's perspective:
When submitted the same val
This is not a bug in Neutron.
Might I also suggest, that as neutronclient is not going to be used in thr
future as it is deprecated, so please use openstackclient.
I tried the command with OpenstackClient and it works properly.
But yes, there is a failure with neutronclient.
http://paste.opensta
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Invalid
** Also affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/166727
tenants, while another set of the policies
are visible to a select group of tenants.
The above scenario requires extending RBAC to Firewalls.
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: access-control fwaas
** Changed in
It doesnt seem valid that Neutron needs to report an error message to
clear something which is not set.
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
/openstack/neutron/commit/6281fddbcb4c471b6b06e24d3faa2990e040f3d2
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engin
not
available in this release.
However, it can be easily added if the date module is released for iptables.
IP Tables allow filteration of Packets based on time, using a 'time' module ,
which is proposed to be used in this patch.
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assig
Hi Gena,
Thanks for the bug but we would need more information for the resolution of the
bug.
Can you please provide more information , as per the policy given in the
below link ??
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/bugs.html#bug-
screening-best-practices
** Changed in: neutr
** Changed in: neutron
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505776
Title:
Validate src_ip_adress, dest_ip_address and ip_version
Statu
Hi Alex,
This does not seem to be a neutron issue, but more of an openstackclient issue.
Besides, can you provide some more details as to which commit tag you verified
this ?
I cannot find this issue with openstackclient+neutron newton version
** Project changed: neutron => python-openstackclien
--ip_version is an extra argument, and thats why its handled differently.
We need to just pass the value of the ip_version
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notifi
tput: http://paste.openstack.org/show/584638/
Expected Cause: IP_Version passed to API is a boolean, as shown in the Paste
above, and not the actual value
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned)
As per [1] , firewall_policy_id need not be a part of the firewall
rules.
[1]: https://github.com/openstack/neutron-
specs/blob/master/specs/newton/fwaas-api-2.0.rst
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-baner
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Also affects: python-openstackclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notifi
For neutron , query has been shared in the ML :
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-
dev/2016-September/103832.html
Awaiting response
** Also affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-baner
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624225
Title:
quota update for LBaaS not working
Status in python-neutronclient:
Ne
": ""}}
Expected Output:
Quotas for LBaaS should have been updated
Update:
Pool and Listener works
Healthmonitor and member doesnt
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: lbaas
** Changed in:
You are right.
But this is a client side issue.
Would be fixing it on the OpenstackClient side, as NeutronClient would be
deprecated soon
** Project changed: neutron => python-openstackclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is s
Discussed on the IRC, and this is an expected behavior
** Changed in: neutron
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1592270
Title:
can get shared
API consumers about the
missing/incorrect combination of IPv6 Addressing options.
[1]: http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/config-
ipv6.html#ipv6-ra-mode-and-ipv6-address-mode-combinations
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Low
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee
** Also affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neut
Expectation is that user can be allowed to enable/disable SNAT independently
if the External Gateway Network ID is set. If not,
+ then it should be avoided
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you a
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580437
Title:
[RFE]: neutron purge- shared network without ports in non owner tenant
: python-neutronclient
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: python-openstackclient
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: python-openstackclient
St
Python-neutronclient and openstackclient also do not support bulk
creation of security groups.
** Also affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
** Also affects: pyt
: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616094
Title:
Required attribute 'lb_method' not specified when creating a LBaaS
Please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/306906/
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1615010
Title:
lbaas member update
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1593130
Title:
There is no description how IP_VERSION values in 'address-scope-
creat
** Also affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
E
: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1552631
Title:
[RFE] Bulk Floating IP allocation
Status in OpenStack Dashboard (Hori
** Also affects: tap-as-a-service
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: tap-as-a-service
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
ht
** Also affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neut
Assigning to myself, and verifying if it is actually required or not.
But this issue is more of a NeutronClient issue, than being a Neutron issue
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Kannan Raman (rkannan-x) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutron
@Bo chi : That may be because Neutron Client is passing the value as an extra
argument.
NeutronClient has the provision to pass attributes to the neutron server, even
if the attributes are not listed for the specified CLI.
You can try to execute the above CLI with -v.
That is how the NeutronClien
This is NOT a neutron bug, its actually a NeutronClient bug.
@manjeet-s-bhatia:
I could see the issue in (1) with a single node devstack.
Besides, a similar issue is already logged for it affecting a different CLI.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1531418
I think it would be gr
Found a similar bug has been fixed in neutron for IPv4.
This can be added to the same, and the validation can hence be taken care in a
single API call
** Project changed: python-neutronclient => neutron
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, w
** Also affects: python-solumclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-solumclient
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenSt
** Also affects: python-solumclient
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-solumclient
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenSt
Verified that this issue does not occur:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack$ neutron firewall-show
0495601d-3688-40e3-83f2-d0456b719735
++--+
| Field | Value
tps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521797
Title:
Support for Name field in Members and HMs
Status in neutron:
Fix Released
Bug description:
https://review.openstack.org/245664
commit cb3ae497c0a6349dfea0a41788b962a4cd3ef3eb
Author: Reedip Banerjee
Date: Fri Nov 13 12:32:27 2015 +0530
Support
Moved to neutronclient, based on the observation mentioned by the Bug
reported in Point#4
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This is not a neutron issue, but a neutronclient side fix, as admin-
state-down is not required during Update in any CLI
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
Looks like this is already
merged:https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1320111
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Public bug reported:
High-Level Description:
Please see
http://logs.openstack.org/75/247375/5/check/gate-congress-dsvm-api/1c5ed1f/logs/tempest.txt.gz?level=ERROR
There is some change required in the tempest plugin for FWaaS
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip
The modification needs to be done at the api-ref document.
So moving this issue to the api-site
** Project changed: neutron => openstack-api-site
** Tags removed: lbaas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
htt
/openstack_dashboard/dashboards/project/firewalls/forms.py)
Need to add Reject option as well in it.
** Affects: horizon
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Changed in: horizon
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
** Descript
BaaS v2 is enabled in the system.
Version:
Git ID :321da8f6263d46bf059163bcf7fd005cf68601bd
Environment:
Ubuntu 14.04, with Devstack All In One, FWaaS , LBaaSv2 and Octavia enabled.
Perceived Severity: Medium
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedi
Public bug reported:
High Level Description:
While working on lbaas V2 , found a somewhat strange behavior.( mention below)
Pre-conditions: Enable LBaaS v2 extension
Step - By -Step reproduction:
a) Verify all the members in Pool
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/python-neutronclient
, just like Next, for facilitating
ease of maneuver between pages.
** Affects: horizon
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Attachment added: "Only Next Hyperlink available.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1514678/+attachme
** Changed in: horizon
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1510579
Title:
[Firewall] Different behavior during creating firewall with empty
rou
Public bug reported:
1. reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/nova$ git log -1
commit 542552754d8da0a97cde32f07a777179c4be608f
Merge: 1dfc36d b08b20b
Author: Jenkins
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:21:38 2015 +
Merge "Make secgroup rules refresh with
refresh_instance_security_rules()"
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: neutron
Status: In Progress => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to neutron.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
2 bugs with the same Description and name were raised.
I am working on the second one #1508828
** Changed in: horizon
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: horizon
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Public bug reported:
Router creation in Neutron allows a --distributed and High Availability
option, which is not present in Horizon.
usage: neutron router-create [-h]
[-f {html,json,json,shell,table,value,yaml,yaml}]
[-c COLUMN] [--max-wi
Public bug reported:
With reference to https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1320796,
the ´Edit Network´ option in Horizon Network does not support --shared option.
##
Expected output in CLI
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack
Public bug reported:
With reference to https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-neutronclient/+bug/1320796,
the ´Edit Network´ option in Horizon Network does not support --shared option.
##
Expected output in CLI
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack
s: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
** Description changed:
- #High level description:
+ #High level description:
Firewall Rule creation takes 2 necessar
** Affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering T
Public bug reported:
Summary : Support for filtering based on ICMP codes is missing in Openstack
firewall.
Further information :
High level description: Currently Openstack firewall rules allow
filtering of ICMP packets.However filtering is done for all ICMP packets. There
can be a poss
Hi Armando,
Please let me know what additional information is required for this issue to be
moved out the Incomplete status.
I would be happy to provide the same, if possible.
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Y
Firewall. Then try to update the Policy and Firewall.
** Affects: python-neutronclient
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Project changed: neutron => python-neutronclient
** Changed in: python-neutronclient
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
Public bug reported:
Following is the error message from firewall-rule-update
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:~/DocNCode/devstack$ neutron firewall-rule-update
usage: neutron firewall-rule-update [-h] [--request-format {json,xml}]
[--protocol {tcp,udp,icmp,any
Public bug reported:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/logs$ neutron firewall-rule-create
--source-ip-address 1.1.1.1 --destination-ip-address 1::1 --protocol tcp
--action allow
Created a new firewall_rule:
++--+
| Field
in neutron:
Opinion
Bug description:
Example:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/python-neutronclient/neutronclient$
neutron firewall-rule-create --protocol tcp --action deny --source-ip-address
1::1
Created a new firewall_r
@Akihiro Motoki,@vikram.choudhary, @Ihar Hrachyshka
As per the current sequence of issues, it seems that necessary/optional
duplicated parameters are ignored in both Update/Create command( and possibly
other commands as well).
Although it is a current behaviour, it would be better if duplicated p
Public bug reported:
When creating firewall-policy and passing --name option( which does not exist),
following error message is reported
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/neutron-fwaas/neutron_fwaas/db/migration/alembic_migrations/versions/liberty/contract$
neutron firewall-policy-create
Public bug reported:
Example:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/python-neutronclient/neutronclient$ neutron
firewall-rule-create --protocol tcp --action deny --source-ip-address 1::1
Created a new firewall_rule:
++--+
| Field
:
##
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:/opt/stack/sqlalchemy$ nova agent-delete
usage: nova agent-delete
error: too few arguments
Try 'nova help agent-delete' for more information.
##
The last line gives a useful information to the new user/developer as to what
he/she
tps://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1494192
Title:
firewall-rule-list shows error after devstack is restarted
Status in neutron:
Invalid
Bug description:
After restarting devstack, when user has not created any firewall:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:~/DocNCode/devstack$ neutron firewall-rule-list
Requ
Public bug reported:
After restarting devstack, when user has not created any firewall:
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:~/DocNCode/devstack$ neutron firewall-rule-list
Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request.
reedip@reedip-VirtualBox:~/DocNCode/devstack$ neutron firewall
ron
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
Status: New
** Tags: fwaas
** Changed in: neutron
Assignee: (unassigned) => Reedip (reedip-banerjee)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, whic
96 matches
Mail list logo
