>Were you expecting it to affect X in some manner? Consequent to my comment, no
>joy WRT what?
I don't know--I never knew anything about X internals, never had to because
what I used worked OK, and know even less now. But even a blind dog finds a
bone once in a while. I was hoping to get lucky
Paul Rogers composed on 2020-04-03 00:22 (UTC-0700):
>> on it I found IceWM behaved as expected (working panning), but didn't include
>> that activity in the response.
> That's probably much closer to working here than your DEs! How did you do it?
I don't think I did anything that I didn't alre
