>Were you expecting it to affect X in some manner? Consequent to my comment, no >joy WRT what?
I don't know--I never knew anything about X internals, never had to because what I used worked OK, and know even less now. But even a blind dog finds a bone once in a while. I was hoping to get lucky. >In forming my previous response I did on a KDE/Plasma installation find it was >overriding the configuration, and didn't want to dig into its settings to try >to >determine how to override its settings override. So on it I found IceWM >behaved as >expected (working panning), but didn't include that activity in the response. That's probably much closer to working here than your DEs! How did you do it? As far as I can see, what you documented in this post is what I have--unless you are using framebuffers--except maybe for the xrandr --panning command. I went back to look at the xrandr command in your first reply to see if that made a difference, but I couldn't figure out a proper --output parameter. The DVI-I-1 you used didn't satisfy it. Neither it, nor the XID, are defined in the man page! Great documentation. NOT. -- Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm Rogers' Second Law: "Everything you do communicates." (I do not personally endorse any additions after this line. TANSTAAFL :-) _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: %(user_address)s
