Hello Xorg List,
Hello Thomas Dickey,
* Thomas Glanzmann [2012-03-24 08:41]:
> I still have the same problems with intel driver and a rotated screen.
> The symptoms are:
> I do something in the xterm like opening an e-mail in mutt or
> type 'dmesg' and the screen freezes until I
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 16:41:02 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> Why did "Do not rely anymore on gperf and m4 following removal of deprecated
> atoms." do this:
>
> -libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -no-undefined
> +libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 1:0:0 -no-undefined
>
> I
On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 16:41:02 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
>> Why did "Do not rely anymore on gperf and m4 following removal of deprecated
>> atoms." do this:
>>
>> -libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -no-undefined
>> +libx
On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > How are the xcb_atom_get_predefined/xcb_atom_get_name_predefined
> > removals not binary incompatible??
>
> Nothing else changed, just the removal of the symbols. All other
> funct
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 16:41:02 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >
> >> Why did "Do not rely anymore on gperf and m4 following removal of
> >> deprecated atoms." do this:
> >>
> >> -libxcb
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> How are the xcb_atom_get_predefined/xcb_atom_get_name_predefined
>>> removals not binary incompatible??
>>
>> Nothing else chan
Folks:
I've started working on implementing smooth scrolling in xdvi, and I have a
question about it.
When I do
xinput --test 9
(where 9 is the deviceid of my Synaptics touchpad) and stroke my finger
down the right-hand side of the touchpad, I get an increasing sequence of
numbers:
mot
On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:52:51PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
T
Hi,
Jeremy Huddleston writes:
> Based on the commit logs, I was under the impression that these
> functions were only meaningful to already-removed functionality. If
> the removal of that functionality didn't even warrant a version bump,
> why would removing its support APIs?
This f
On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:56 PM, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jeremy Huddleston writes:
>
>> Based on the commit logs, I was under the impression that these
>> functions were only meaningful to already-removed functionality. If
>> the removal of that functionality didn't even warran
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:52:51PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:34 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >> Think about this from the libc perspective. libc *may h
I think, that the key issue here is this:
> version-info is current/revision/age based
> version-number is major/minor/tiny based
> The former confuses the heck out of me, and I always need to lookup
> documentation for it. I suggest you might want to switch to
> version-number.
Well, the version-
transset is an utility for setting opacity property.
Features:
* select window by clicking (as transset)
* select actual focused X11 window
* select window by pointing
* select by window name or id
* force toggle
* increase or decrease opacity
This is the first release of transset ori
Jeremy Huddleston writes:
> Ah, ok. Thanks, it sounded like it was private API. That sounds
> fine, but please try to avoid doing this in the future. IMO, it's
> better to keep around deprecated functionality than it is to bump the
> major version of the library ...
>
> ... also, if
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 04:24:10PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:52:51PM -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
> >> On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:19 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 14:03 -0700, Jeremy H
15 matches
Mail list logo
