On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 16:41:02 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Why did "Do not rely anymore on gperf and m4 following removal of deprecated > atoms." do this: > > -libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 0:0:0 -no-undefined > +libxcb_util_la_LDFLAGS = -version-info 1:0:0 -no-undefined > > I don't see this change requiring a major version bump which should > only be done for binary compatibility changes. Yes, you removed the > xcb_atom_get_predefined and xcb_atom_get_name_predefined functions, > but not in a binary incompatible way, so you should not have bumped > the major version which requires relinking every library and > application that links against the library. > How are the xcb_atom_get_predefined/xcb_atom_get_name_predefined removals not binary incompatible??
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
