Dnia poniedziałek, 5 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Observation:
> you're running 1600x1200@85Hz while basic Single Link DVI has it's
> maximum at 1600x1200@60Hz
>
> To run higher resolutions or frequency, the entire chain has to support
> reduced blanking capabilities and there's
Dnia wtorek, 6 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
> On Montag, 5. November 2012 23:42:21 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> > But in fact my monitor IS connected via a standard VGA
> > connector. It simply has no DVI plug, only VGA. My graphics card
> > has a single output connector and a splitter, w
On Montag, 5. November 2012 23:42:21 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> But in fact my monitor IS connected via a standard VGA
> connector. It simply has no DVI plug, only VGA. My graphics card
> has a single output connector and a splitter, which allows me to
> connect two monitors, both using VGA co
Dnia poniedziałek, 5 listopada 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Since there's also no relation to the compositor or the ARGB state of the
> window, yet the problem is (is it?) restricted to konsole, i'm out of
> ideas.
I've taken a closer look and its not only console that looks bad. I think
On Montag, 5. November 2012 11:19:00 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> $ xrandr
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 8192 x 8192
> DVI-I-1 connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x
> axis y axis) 352mm x 264mm
>1600x1200 85.0*+ 75.0 70.0 65.0 60
Dnia środa, 31 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> Back on topic:
> --> Did you have a chance to check the ARGB/Compositing relation then?
No relation. As I've mentioned in another post, I think it has something to
do with font renderere, which works in 1280x1024 mode, while the sc
Dnia czwartek, 1 listopada 2012, Henrik Pauli napisał:
[...]
> > Check "xrandr -q" for supported modes, outputs and current mode and
> > use "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --mode 1600x1200 --scale 1x1" to set it
> >
> > This blurring would however impact absolutely everything, every font
> > in every wi
So, I'm at my office and I'm ready to check everything which may help us
solve this problem. First, here is the output of xrandr:
$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 8192 x 8192
DVI-I-1 connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
352mm x 264m
On 2012-11-01 18:54, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 16:45:21 CEST, Henrik Pauli wrote:
>> --scale has nothing to do with the final scaling
> if i run "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 2x2" here, i get "doubled"
> resolution (no panning)
Yeah, but that probably wasn't the p
On Donnerstag, 1. November 2012 16:45:21 CEST, Henrik Pauli wrote:
> --scale has nothing to do with the final scaling
if i run "xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --scale 2x2" here, i get "doubled" resolution
(no panning)
For
xrandr --output DVI-I-1 --set "scaling mode" "Full aspect"
I just get an error (s
On 2012-10-31 11:44, Thomas Lübking wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
>> Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał: [...]
>>> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling
>>> the image to what it assumes is the native resoluti
On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 14:44:27 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> Output definitely is 1600x1200. Here are some lines from Xorg.0.log:
>
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Output DVI-I-1 connected
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Output DVI-I-2 disconnected
> [77.187] (II) NOUVEAU(0): Using user
On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał:
> [...]
>> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling the
>> image to what it assumes is the native resolution. Try setting the
>> driver to let the moni
Dnia środa, 31 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
> On Mittwoch, 31. Oktober 2012 08:25:12 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
[...]
> > I think that the driver sets the resolution to 1280x1024
>
> checking is better then "thinking" ;-)
>
> > (I wish I could change it to 1600x1200, which is the des
Dnia wtorek, 30 października 2012, Mark Wagner napisał:
[...]
> The driver probably thinks you're running an LCD, and is scaling the
> image to what it assumes is the native resolution. Try setting the
> driver to let the monitor perform scaling, or try changing your
> display resolution slightly
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> I've given a try to latest nouveau driver on my Dell T5400 workstation with
> NVidia G86 (Quadro NVS 290). I'm using a Samsung SyncMaster 959NF CRT
> screen.
> At the first glance, one may say, that the first one is blurry becouse of
> hands
Dnia poniedziałek, 29 października 2012, Thomas Lübking napisał:
[...]
> If it was on nvidia only i'd btw. guess you've FXAA enabled, but the way
> it is, it actually will rather be a bug in either nouveau or kwin. We
> however got to figure "where".
Thanks for your reply. I suppose, i'll work on
On Montag, 29. Oktober 2012 12:57:37 CEST, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
> I've given a try to latest nouveau driver on my Dell T5400
> workstation with NVidia G86 (Quadro NVS 290). I'm using a
> Samsung SyncMaster 959NF CRT screen.
>
> Almost everything works well. Almost, becouse fonts in terminal
> are
18 matches
Mail list logo
