On Sex, 2013-07-19 at 15:47 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:40:48PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> > On 07/10/2013 06:58 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >>On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> > >>
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:40:48PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 06:58 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >>On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi, Matt
> >>as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to
On Sáb, 2013-07-13 at 19:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> On 07/10/2013 06:58 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >> On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, Matt
> >> as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to b
On 07/10/2013 06:58 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
Hi, Matt
as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to backport a very easy
patch from git master [2].
In less of 24 hours we got
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>
> Hi, Matt
> as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to backport a very easy
> patch from git master [2].
>
> In less of 24 hours we got 4 positive votes [3], which means
On Qua, 2013-07-10 at 23:14 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>
> Hi, Matt
> as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to backport a very easy
> patch from git master [2].
>
> In less of 24 hours we got 4 positive votes [3], which means that
On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
Hi, Matt
as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to backport a very easy
patch from git master [2].
In less of 24 hours we got 4 positive votes [3], which means that is
important. Linux Fedora already got it but others distros may not.
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 08:24:50AM +0700, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:05:36PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> > Does that mean this fixed the bug you had, or this reintroduced a bug?
>
> As far as I'm concerned, it's a regression (or I missed something). The
> bug
Hi Matt,
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:37:40AM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> Reverted.
>
> 187cb5a..7dec1d3 server-1.14-branch -> server-1.14-branch
>
> Emmanuel, can you test and let me know?
Using 7dec1d3 now, no issue to report.
Thanks,
-- Emmanuel
>
> thanks,
> Matt
>
>
>
> On 06/21/201
Reverted.
187cb5a..7dec1d3 server-1.14-branch -> server-1.14-branch
Emmanuel, can you test and let me know?
thanks,
Matt
On 06/21/2013 02:34 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:17:45PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>> Anyone able to help track this down? I will hold of
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:17:45PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
>Anyone able to help track this down? I will hold off until
> tomorrow (at least) before releasing 1.14.2.
I'm still travelling, please revert it if you think it's a regression.
will have a look once I'm back.
Cheers,
Peter
> On
Anyone able to help track this down? I will hold off until
tomorrow (at least) before releasing 1.14.2.
thanks,
Matt
On 06/20/2013 07:24 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:05:36PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
Does that mean this fixed the bug you had, or this
Hi Matt,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 06:05:36PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> Does that mean this fixed the bug you had, or this reintroduced a bug?
As far as I'm concerned, it's a regression (or I missed something). The
bug I linked has apparently been solved by this commit but this commit
*created* th
Hi Emmanuel,
Does that mean this fixed the bug you had, or this reintroduced a bug?
thanks,
Matt
On 06/15/2013 10:03 PM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:40:38PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
Peter Hutterer (4):
dix: pre-scale x by the screen:device:resolution ratio
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:40:38PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote:
> Peter Hutterer (4):
> dix: pre-scale x by the screen:device:resolution ratio
On my machine, this commit (14d89b9) seems to have introduced what it was trying
to solve [0].
Device is SynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad.
Thanks.
[0] ht
Hi Chí-Thanh,
Whoops, my bad. I missed that email.
merged.
3425975..187cb5a server-1.14-branch -> server-1.14-branch
Matt
On 06/14/2013 02:47 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw that the patch that I nominated on xorg-devel
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver
Hi,
I saw that the patch that I nominated on xorg-devel
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=9878e097a7de2f86eff0dcfd9fe5d83b162197ec
was not included in the 1.14 branch. Do you plan to include it?
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
