On Sex, 2013-07-19 at 15:47 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 07:40:48PM -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > > On 07/10/2013 06:58 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:14:50PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > >>On Qui, 2013-06-13 at 16:40 -0600, Matt Dew wrote: > > >> > > >>Hi, Matt > > >>as state in bug #59825 [1]. We need contact you, to backport a very easy > > >>patch from git master [2]. > > >> > > >>In less of 24 hours we got 4 positive votes [3], which means that is > > >>important. Linux Fedora already got it but others distros may not. > > >> > > >>[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59825 > > >>[2] > > >>http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/?id=cc3d1a5a6120e721a46c67446ba68f5596055633 > > >>[3] > > >>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-12681/xorg-x11-server-1.14.2-3.fc19 > > > > > >didn't seen this email before I sent out the other email - Matt, that's the > > >patch in my pull request so if you cherry-picked it yourself you can ignore > > >the pull. > > > > > >Cheers, > > > Peter > > > > > > > Peter, > > Your pull request that I merged seems quite different than > > Sérgio's patch. > > sorry about the slow answer, double-checked the patch and they're the same, > the commit IDs are even the same (cc3d1 cherry-picked to 3608d). am I > missing something here?
No, everything is fine. I made a resume of state of art on xorg-devel ML http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-July/036960.html Though, maybe you (Peter) can upstream the 2 patches floating around (or not) made by anonymous people and reported in bug trackers, so please If you may reply on http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2013-July/036960.html xorg-devel ML. Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.x.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
