On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 10:26 +0100, Stefano Avallone wrote:
> On Monday 09 February 2009 20:28:14 Johannes Engel wrote:
> > Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Interesting, thanks for trying to narrow it down. I don't see anything
> > > on re-review that would cause huge increases in the amount of memory
> >
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 17:24 -0800, Bipin George Mathew wrote:
> I was looking into way of accelerating Cairo using a glitz-backend and
> had a bunch of related questions:
>
> - What is the current status of glitz? Is anyone working on it?
People contribute patches occasionally, just recently we r
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 08:21 +0100, Marco wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> > So currently aside from glitz, there are experiments to show that simply
> > doing basic compositing using OpenGL can be much faster than XRender:
> >
Excerpts from Flittigs at PICT's message of Tue Sep 15 11:47:57 +0100 2009:
> So we configured xproto with following command :
>
> *sudo ./autogen.sh --prefix=/opt/gfx-test/
There is your problem. Always think long and hard before you invoke root
privileges. In this case sudo is sanitisin
way than
> reverting the code?
Can you identify which byte is causing the SEGV? Is it the first or near
the end of the image? Admittedly it's immaterial, I just want to know why.
If you can endure running X under valgrind, that will be very useful.
-ickle
--
Chris Wilson, Intel O
im chance that
intel_gpu_dump will be able to grab the illegal batch buffer, but usually
it just contains noise post-hangcheck.
Please update your kernel and if it reoccurs, file a bug, including
i915_error_state.
-ickle
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
ng/stall.) In order to distinguish the different causes we need the
means to reproduce and the i915_error_state recorded at the time of the
error, as well as identification of hardware and any other hints gathered
from the system.
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html
http://i
machine. I just start it, move
> it around and I hit the issue.
Sounds like https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15911
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.f
ot XF86TouchpadToggle: line 122 of inet
> intel_bufmgr_gem.c:713: Error mapping buffer 65452 (pixmap): Cannot allocate
> memory .
So it seems to survive the original bug, only to trigger a later one by
hogging all the memory and causing ENOMEM. That segfault looks reminiscent
of:
[libdrm]
c
, as I downgraded to
> 2.11.0 and system is stable again.
Can you please file a bug as detailed above? Getting the i915_error_state
and Xorg.log would be most useful. Are you using XRender or OpenGL
desktop effects?
Thanks.
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
cible.
You need libdrm.git, in particular:
commit 726210f87d558d558022f35bc8c839e798a19f0c
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Thu Jun 24 11:38:00 2010 +0100
intel: Limit tiled pitches to 8192 on pre-i965.
Fixes:
Bug 28515 - Failed to allocate framebuffer when exceed 2048 width
then it will get fixed.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your sub
eds to be either enabled when
compiled into your kernel, or you need to add i915.modeset=1 to your
module options, e.g.:
$ echo options i915 modeset=1 > /etc/modprobe.d/i915-kms.conf
This should have been taken care of during a debian upgrade.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Techn
ably wanted to
> use the intel driver. If Xorg.0.log had contained a message like:
It should have autoloaded the i915 module before giving up. I'll look
into that, thanks.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xor
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:24:49 +0530, DarkKnight BrightWarrior
wrote:
> I want 1366x768 resolution with rotation support.
Use the intel driver as that is the one for your chipset.
xrandr -o left,right,inverted,normal function as expected on my 945s.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Sou
> >>
> >> Symptom: upon starting starting vmware, X crashed.
> >>
> > X log? Â gdb backtrace?
>
> Hope this help ...
This should fix it:
commit 537fa55ed2449e91f3dd1e04abc720c6818d7227
Author: Chris Wilson
Date: Sun Jan 2 09:06:28 2011 +
dri:
Time for another xf86-video-intel snapshot. Hopefully this will be the
last before we tag the release. Please test.
-Chris
Adam Jackson (2):
xv: Fix interlace computation
dri2: Fix interlace computation
Chris Wilson (16):
NEWS: 2.14, I meant the upcoming 2.14 release!
G35
Immediately upon tagging the last snapshot, I hit an assertion failure.
Typical. However, nobody else has complained of any new issue arising
from the snapshot, so I hereby proclaim 2.14.0 is ready for
distribution.
Enjoy.
-Chris
Chris Wilson (3):
i965: Fix off-by-one in assert
NEWS
FIG_DRM_I915 and CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS enabled for your
kernel. The latter can be optionally replaced with i915.modeset on the
boot command line or at module load time. This does presume that you have
at least a 2.6.29 kernel.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source T
" switch to my old
> "VGA Text" mode (from this crazy 240x67) and, ideally, back to KMS too?
look at Documentation/fb/modedb.txt for a description of the video=
parameter to specify the mode for the console. Something like
video=640x480 will restore the VGA mode with 80x25 ch
gt; happened with 2.6.37.4 kernel, which I've been using since Saturday. There
> were no such problems with earlier kernels.
You were fortunate, as the bug in all its guises is much older indeed.
The final fix, I hope, was:
commit 9334ef755f060e251f3f395caeda1a58b6834ea3
Author: Chris W
-intel-2.15.0.tar.gz
SHA1: 0a5cb7f40ad9b1fe10479aeea55e42110fb21810 xf86-video-intel-2.15.0.tar.gz
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: htt
llbacks.
Do you mind describing you use-case for alphamaps and could you create a
little benchmark for your workload?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedeskt
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:11:28 +0100, Hans-Peter Budek wrote:
> Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > Do you mind describing you use-case for alphamaps and could you create a
> > little benchmark for your workload?
> > -Chris
> >
>
>
> I´am programming a
-2.17.0.tar.gz
SHA1: aeea2c4e8e9c25b84802c2f0dc26942ccc3590c1 xf86-video-intel-2.17.0.tar.gz
SHA256: 7da1d957b4abe6da38958f3c282d857138e7318028286dc1a1f57df5e0ff0da8
xf86-video-intel-2.17.0.tar.gz
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
signature.asc
Description: Digital
anyone else to reproduce this issue would be if you
were to identify the most common slow op and translate that into the
appropriate x11perf command line.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org s
26 matches
Mail list logo
