The developer of the Linux Libertine font package is probably going to add
diacritic-stacking to the font's capabilities (mark-to-mark positioning?).
I've asked for circumflex + breve. Are there other diacritics that potential
users of Libertine are wanting to stack? If so, I'd be happy to pass th
I'm creating some hyphenation rules for Jarai texts that I'm
interlinearizing. Here's the problem: In various texts, a complex character
such as LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH BREVE might be encoded as a single code
point (U+0103) or as a combination of code points (LATIN SMALL LETTER A:
U+0061 plus COM
e who doesn't do scripting? am I supposed to use decomposed
characters?)?
Thanks.
Josh
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:11 PM, maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:00:42 -0500, Joshua and Amy
> wrote:
> > I'm creating some hyphenation rules for Jarai texts that I'm
> > in
Many, thanks, all, and sorry for missing the earlier discussion.
But back to my original question, is there a way to get \hyphenation to
require only one form and the rest come for free?
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> On 8 Jul 2011, at 23:24, maxwell wrote:
>
> > I found \
I'm typesetting with XeLaTeX, using fontspec, and calling a font provided
to me by the publisher of a manuscript I'm working on.
My problem is with* U+012D ( ĭ ) in boldface*. If I include " \textbf{ĭ} "
in the document, I get the following error (down to the end of the log
file):
** ERROR ** Typ
I'm typesetting with XeLaTeX, using fontspec, and calling a font provided
to me by the publisher of a manuscript I'm working on. (Same as my previous
post!)
The language I work with has a letter O with circumflex and breve
(U+00F4,U+0306): ô̆. However, the publisher-provided font does not use
mark
Here is a Minimal Working Example. Unfortunately, the font is proprietary,
so I can't send that. What I'm hoping is that someone can point me towards
a solution or work-around in the absence of being able to examine the font
itself.
Thanks!
Josh
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josh
Is there anything I can do about an xdvipdfmx bug (if that's what it is)?
Some workaround? Thanks.
Josh
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> I see nothing suspicious, can be an xdvipdfmx bug or a font bug not
> cached by those tools.
>
> Regards,
> Khaled
>
>
--