Hi all:
This is the first time that I post here and I am just starting to work
with xe(la)tex.
What I would like to know is this: is it possible to use the pst-pdf
package on a document which is compiled with xelatex?
If I had this document:
-- test.tex
On 13-04-2010 9:33, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
This is the first time that I post here and I am just starting to work
with xe(la)tex.
What I would like to know is this: is it possible to use the pst-pdf
package on a document which is compiled with xelatex?
If I had this document:
-
Hi all:
Please consider this file:
--- test.tex ---
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{book}
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
\frontmatter
\tableofcontents
\XeTeXinputen
On 29-04-2010 19:08, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
As you may guess from its contents, the encoding that I am using is
cp1252. If I compile this file, then, at the table of contents I get
"Général de Gaulle", instead of "Général de Gaulle".
I can eliminate this by commenting the line
\XeTeXdefaul
Hi all,
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\includegraphics[scale=.4]{Figura_3-1.jpg}
\end{document}
with PDFLaTeX, then all goes well. But if I use XeLaTeX instead, then
I get this:
Overfull \hbox (427.1866pt too wide) in paragraph at lines
On 30-04-2010 10:22, Peter Dyballa wrote:
But I think it is a flaw.
Which proof do you have?
Are you requesting a proof of an opinion? That's rather strange, but I
will do my best.
Please consider again this file:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{book}
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel}
\usepackage
On 30-04-2010 10:49, Peter Dyballa wrote:
\includegraphics[scale=.4]{Figura_3-1.jpg}
Does the starred form perform better?
No. I get the same message.
Does it work better when you give the maximal height or width?
If you mean using the \resizebox command, yes, it does work. Thanks.
Best
On 30-04-2010 11:25, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
But I think it is a flaw.
Which proof do you have?
Are you requesting a proof of an opinion? That's rather strange, but
I will do my best.
Please consider again this file:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{book}
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel}
\usepa
On 30-04-2010 11:42, Peter Dyballa wrote:
When the \tableofcontents command is found, the line
\XeTeXinputencoding "cp1252"
was not read yet.
Which is your proof?
The command \XeTeXinputencoding resets the default UTF-8 or UTF-16 input
encoding to something else, restricted, awkward, whatev
On 30-04-2010 12:28, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\includegraphics[scale=.4]{Figura_3-1.jpg}
\end{document}
with PDFLaTeX, then all goes well. But if I use XeLaTeX instead, then
I get this:
Overfull \hbox (427.18
On 30-04-2010 11:24, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Does it work better when you give the maximal height or width?
If you mean using the \resizebox command, yes, it does work. Thanks.
No, I thought of:
\includegraphics[height=96mm]{Kollaps.jpg}
Yes, this also solves my problem. Thanks.
Best regard
On 30-04-2010 12:07, Peter Dyballa wrote:
And all because I wanted to use a certain encoding instead of another
one! Besides, this has nothing to do with what I wish or do not wish
to do, since I am trying to compile a multi-chapter document in which
each of the 15 chapters was written by a diff
On 30-04-2010 12:21, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Please consider this file:
--- test.tex ---
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{book}
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
\frontm
Hi all (yes, it's me again!):
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
---
\end{document}
with XeLaTeX, then I get a PDF file which contains a single character,
namely an em-dash. But if
On 30-04-2010 13:31, Philiрp Rеichmuth wrote:
I have participated in discussions both on newsgroups and on mailing
lists for ten years and I don't remember having ever been so attacked as
now.
Sometimes people can be a bit abrasive. This are normally what gives IT a
bad name. Try not to care t
On 30-04-2010 15:59, Peter Dyballa wrote:
http://www.fc.up.pt/mp/jcsantos/imagens/Figura_3-1.JPG
It also contains an useless sRGB profile while it's only black and
white. Looks like a candidate for TikZ/PGF... Or is the handwriting
important?
I don't know. It's the author of the chapter tha
On 30-04-2010 15:29, Alan Munn wrote:
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
---
\end{document}
with XeLaTeX, then I get a PDF file which contains a single character,
namely an em-dash.
On 30-04-2010 15:35, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8)
So, it is a slightly more recent version than yours (and the problem
might lie there).
No, I can reproduce your problem with miktex 2.7 too.
Your picture is 1886 pixel wide and declares its
On 30-04-2010 19:06, Jonathan Kew wrote:
Please consider again this file:
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{book}
\usepackage[frenchb]{babel}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
\frontmatter
\tableofcontents
\XeTeXinputencoding "cp1252"
\XeTeXdefaultenco
st regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
esn't have
that specific character, but shouldn't it be able to create one just by
putting an acute accent over the letter _n_?
Can anyone suggest a way around this problem?
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive,
On 03-05-2010 11:35, Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
Now, I am not surprised by the fact that that specific font doesn't have
that specific character, but shouldn't it be able to create one just by
putting an acute accent over the letter _n_?
The problem you have here is the result of xunicode's a
On 03-05-2010 12:45, Michiel Kamermans wrote:
Then I will have to work without the xunicode and xltxtra packages. I
hope that that will not create new problems.
You could, but what's stopping you from using the actual letter ń?
Within the tex file? Because I don't know how to get it from the
On 03-05-2010 13:24, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xunicode}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\begin{document}
\'n
\end{document}
then I get a PDF file which, besides the page number, only contains the
diacritic «ń». That's what I w
ent}\pagestyle{empty}
text ×±
math $×±$
\end{document}
Great! Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 03-05-2010 14:48, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Try this (I can't test as I don't have your font):
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{DTLUnicoST}
\UndeclareUTFcomposite[\UTFencname]{x0144}{\'}{n}
\begin{document}
\'n
\end{document}
Thanks, but that does not
On 03-05-2010 15:43, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Are you able to get the accent in this font e.g. in Word or a
similar application?
No. I tried it with Word and also with Wordpad, but all I got was "´n".
But you get an accent. The main questions are is this accent in the
font, and if yes where? Co
this
|[Mapping=tex-text]
But I am using it. I repeat: if I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text]{DTLUnicoST}
\begin{document}
ń
\end{document}
I get nothing.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
for other accents?
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
lse altogether
wrong with that font.
Like I said before, it does not work.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 04-05-2010 8:39, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Your suggestion works. Thank you very much.
Then this should work too: (the first will naturally redefine \' for
all fonts, but as you can see you can use another command if you
want):
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\setmainfont{Arial}
\
$x+y=5^2$?
\end{document}
compiles fine for me (with XeLaTeX).
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Hi all,
Earlier today I reported this bug concerning Asymptote:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3006849&group_id=12&atid=685683
John Bowman (who is, I think, member of the Asymptote team) made this
comment: "This is not an Asymptote bug. In fact, it works fine for
qual parts (TeX big points, bp) while TeX gets 72.27 equal
parts from 1".
Thanks a lot.
Just update MiKTeX!
I update my MiKTeX installation regularly. So, I suppose that it still
uses the old version.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
Hi all:
I have been working on a text whose main font is DTL Unico:
http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Unico_rdrct.html
I have just noticed that the "fi" and "fl" ligatures are not created. To
be more precise: if I compile this document:
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{xltx
On 09-06-2010 16:45, José Carlos Santos wrote:
I have been working on a text whose main font is DTL Unico:
http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Unico_rdrct.html
I have just noticed that the "fi" and "fl" ligatures are not created. To
be more precise: if I compile this docum
On 09-06-2010 18:23, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I have been working on a text whose main font is DTL Unico:
http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Unico_rdrct.html
I have just noticed that the "fi" and "fl" ligatures are not
created. To be more precise: if I compile this document:
\documentclass{article}
\p
On 09-06-2010 18:37, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote:
tex-text mapping has nothing to do with f ligatures.
Ooops ... try this instead:
\setmainfont[Mapping=tex-text, Ligatures=Common]{DTLUnicoST}
Thanks, but it does not work.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
what kind of OT features the various version have got. If
you have the Type1 version that may be a problem.
No. I have OpenType.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/lis
On 09-06-2010 19:16, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I have been working on a text whose main font is DTL Unico:
http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Unico_rdrct.html
I have just noticed that the "fi" and "fl" ligatures are not
created. To be more precise: if I compile this document:
\documentclass{article}
\p
On 09-06-2010 20:46, José Carlos Santos wrote:
I have been working on a text whose main font is DTL Unico:
http://www.dutchtypelibrary.nl/Unico_rdrct.html
I have just noticed that the "fi" and "fl" ligatures are not
created. To be more precise: if I compile this docum
nerating output;
file test.pdf may not be valid." I don't know a reason for this.
Thanks you very much for trying to help me.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--- log file ---
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTe
On 10-06-2010 10:06, José Carlos Santos wrote:
I found a copy of DTLUnicoST with the following details:
File size: 53 kb, Version 1.0, Generated on 14-03-2000 by Dutch Type
Library
PostScript outlines, 245 glyphs, no standard kern pairs, no embedded
bitmaps
OT: kern feature only.
If this is
tylistic Set 1
zeroSlashed Zero
Where SCRIPT is one of the returned values of the first command. This
should show what script/language/feature combinations supported by the
font.
Thank you very much for your help.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
On 18-09-2010 15:59, Ujjwol Lamichhane wrote:
I asked one question 2 days before still no reply. Is this mailing list
active ?
There were about 20 new posts the last 24 hours. Does this answer your
question?
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
, but I would never recommend it to beginners. It
doesn't help if you have to learn LaTeX/ConTeXt *and* Emacs at the same time.
TeXworks seems to be a modern, Unicode-capable solution, and AFAIK it is
included in TeX Live.
Yes, it is. And it is also included in MiKTeX.
Best regards,
José C
Do not get me wrong, it is very powerful and
extendable.
Emacs is just for powerusers.
Wow! I did not know that I was a poweruser. It feels great! Thanks for
letting me know! :-)
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive
tead of the straight quote character ' I use a prime ′, then I
get no error message, but I get:
Missing character: There is no ′ in font cmr10!
What should I do in order to get the prime?
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Arch
}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\usepackage{xltxtra}
\usepackage{unicode-math}
\setmathfont{Asana Math}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
$P′$
\end{document}
then the PDF file contains Q″ instead of P′. Why is that? Do you have
the same problem?
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
best solution is to make sure
you have only one version of a font.
I deleted the TTF version and all works well now. Thanks a lot.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman
e you using the fontenc
package?
For no good reason, I guess. :-(
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 17-02-2011 3:05, Michael Joyner wrote:
I am trying to encrypt a PDF while retaining the bookmarks and have
discovered pdftk eats said bookmarks. :(
Strange! I use PDFtk frequently and it never eats my bookmarks.
So I discovered the existence of the pdfcrypt but now I get:
! Package p
Hi all,
Can someone please explain why is it that if I compile the document:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec,lmodern}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
«A»
\end{document}
what I get is
ńAż
instead of
«A» ?
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
On 08-06-2011 11:50, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Can someone please explain why is it that if I compile the document:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{fontspec,lmodern}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
«A»
\end{document}
what I get is
ńAż
instead of
«A» ?
Because you are using T1 fo
Hi all,
If I compile this file:
\documentclass{article}
\renewcommand{\rmdefault}{ccr}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\begin{document}
Some text.
\end{document}
with PDFLaTeX, then I get the sentence "Some text." typeset using the
concrete fonts. However, if I replace the command
\usepackage[T1]{f
the command \setmainfont. But how do I
discover which name should I use to get the Concrete fonts? I tried
"Concrete", but I got an error message.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, e
fmx
step (xdv->pdf) the other and than the output is wrong (I had this
problem with the libertine fonts).
Thanks *a lot*.
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
On 23-11-2011 13:08, Joseph Wright wrote:
The LaTeX3 bundle on CTAN was updated at the weekend, but this is always
done as a unit. So the CTAN versions all match.
Sorry, but the packages do not match (at least not yesterday):
$ cd install/macros/latex/contrib/
$ ls -l l3*
-rw-r--r-- 1 mik Non
sider using TeX!
Why shouldn't I consider using TeX? (I am Portuguese, by the way.)
Best regards,
José Carlos Santos
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
59 matches
Mail list logo
