Re: [XeTeX] Copyright page with \pagestyle{empty} clears all styles

2016-02-07 Thread Zdenek Wagner
Just define it before loading the .sty file. When searching the source of an error it is sometimes useful to put \errorcontextlines= just below \documentclass. It will show you the trace, so if the error is encountered somewhere in a .sty file but triggered by something in your file, it is eas

[XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
Dear Khaled -- In the thread at http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/feature-requests/19/, you wrote : > 2014-07-19 > > The new dviasm is now hosted on GitHub: > https://github.com/khaledhosny/dviasm, it should handle most aspects > of XDV files that current versions of XeTeX use. If there are no > ma

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
Yes, I am using 3.5.1, Khaled; I shall try a downgrade. > Python 3.5.1 (v3.5.1:37a07cee5969, Dec 6 2015, 01:54:25) [MSC v.1900 64 bit > (AM > D64)] on win32 ** Phil. Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:48:06AM +, Philip Taylor wrote: >> I downloaded the most recent ve

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
Khaled Hosny wrote: > Looks like you are using Python 3.x, but this code was written against > Python 2.x, so you will need to use that. Thank you, Khaled; all now works well (see below). In your experience, how difficult would it be to enhance 'dviasm' to send the version of Python currently

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
Philip Taylor wrote: > n your experience, how difficult would it be to enhance 'dviasm' to > send the version ... -> "... to /sense/ the version ... -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.99994 and xeCJK

2016-02-07 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 7/2/16 03:29, Qing Lee wrote: But I find two issues after installing new XeTeX from w32tex.org. Firstly, the character class argument of \XeTeXinterchartoks seems not to be enlarged: \XeTeXinterchartoks 1 300 = {\relax} \bye I get This is XeTeX, Version 3.14159265-2.6-0.4 (TeX Live 20

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.99994 and xeCJK

2016-02-07 Thread Jonathan Kew
On 7/2/16 03:29, Qing Lee wrote: On 2016-02-07 at 07:26:18 +0800 GMT, Akira Kakuto wrote: Dear xeCJK authors, In the developing XeTeX, which will be in the upcoming TeX Live 2016, the limit of character class is changed as: @d char_class_limit = 16384 @d char_class_ignored == char_class_limit

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 09:48:06AM +, Philip Taylor wrote: > I downloaded the most recent version available from Github yesterday, > installed the most recent Python available for Windows, but 'dviasm' > nonetheless reports : > > > $ dviasm hyperlinks.xdv > > File "D:\(elided)\Oral history\T

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.99994 and xeCJK

2016-02-07 Thread Akira Kakuto
Dear Jonathan, Akira, if you could update your build for people to test, that would be great -- thanks! I uploaded the new binary for windows. It will be available after a day or so. Two tests by Qing were OK. It seems that xeCJK works. However I was not able to create a format file for ConTeX

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:41:15AM +, Philip Taylor wrote: > > > Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > Looks like you are using Python 3.x, but this code was written against > > Python 2.x, so you will need to use that. > > Thank you, Khaled; all now works well (see below). In your experience, > how d

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX 0.99994 and xeCJK

2016-02-07 Thread Akira Kakuto
However I was not able to create a format file for ConTeXt mkii. See an attached cont-en.log. Fixed by Jonathan. I've just uploaded a new binary of XeTeX for windows. Best regards, Akira -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: h

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 10:41:15AM +, Philip Taylor wrote: >> Thank you, Khaled; all now works well (see below). In your experience, >> how difficult would it be to enhance 'dviasm' to send the version of >> Python currently installed and adjust its behaviour accordin

Re: [XeTeX] DVIasm

2016-02-07 Thread Philip Taylor
P.S. Experimenting against both versions, I found that what Python 3 detected as syntax errors in the Version 2 source prevented the test from ever being evaluated, but the following three changes allow the diagnostic to be issue correctly for both Python 2 and Python 3 : def BadDVI(msg): raise