I tested the new version, and now it functions wonderfully.
Thank you Khaled, for solving the problem, and thanks also to all others who
helped uncovering it.
Greetings,
Christian
Am 20.10.2010 um 11:51 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:35:06AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> (never use terse commit messages, one day you will regret it).
I actually have a three lines log message explained why I did that
(which agrees to my vague memories posted twice now), so this issue
should be fixed in git version now,
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:31:13PM +1030, Will Robertson wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 19:09:52 +1030, Taco Hoekwater
> said:
>
> >On 10/20/2010 10:35 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >>
> >>Very useful! Knowing that there were a working version I was able to
> >>track this down (with some git bisect magic), t
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:39:52AM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 10:35 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >
> >Very useful! Knowing that there were a working version I was able to
> >track this down (with some git bisect magic), the culprit is the
> >DisplayOperatorMinHeight math parameter, w
On 2010-10-20 19:09:52 +1030, Taco Hoekwater
said:
On 10/20/2010 10:35 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Very useful! Knowing that there were a working version I was able to
track this down (with some git bisect magic), the culprit is the
DisplayOperatorMinHeight math parameter, while ago I increased
On 10/20/2010 10:35 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Very useful! Knowing that there were a working version I was able to
track this down (with some git bisect magic), the culprit is the
DisplayOperatorMinHeight math parameter, while ago I increased it from
1400 to 2180 and XeTeX seems not to like that.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 05:21:32PM +1030, Will Robertson wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 09:13:36 +1030, Khaled Hosny
> said:
>
> >I can reproduce it and while ago have seen it in a posted sample
> >somewhere on the web. I don't know what is special about Euler's
> >display summation to trigger such a bug
On 2010-10-20 09:13:36 +1030, Khaled Hosny
said:
I can reproduce it and while ago have seen it in a posted sample
somewhere on the web. I don't know what is special about Euler's
display summation to trigger such a bug (if it is actually a bug),
Strange, with a little more effort I can now
> I can reproduce it and while ago have seen it in a posted sample
> somewhere on the web. I don't know what is special about Euler's
> display summation to trigger such a bug (if it is actually a bug), text
> style summation is just fine.
In displaystyle, the sub- and superscripts are exactly on
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:51:19AM +1030, Will Robertson wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 07:52:09 +1030, Ross Moore
> said:
>
> >On 20/10/2010, at 6:14 AM, Christian Pech wrote:
> >
> >>I already reported this problem a week ago, but maybe the message got lost.
> >>The following latex-file produces wrong
On Oct 19, 2010, at 5:21 PM, Will Robertson wrote:
> On 2010-10-20 07:52:09 +1030, Ross Moore said:
>
>> On 20/10/2010, at 6:14 AM, Christian Pech wrote:
>>> I already reported this problem a week ago, but maybe the message got lost.
>>> The following latex-file produces wrong spacing when comp
On 2010-10-20 07:52:09 +1030, Ross Moore
said:
On 20/10/2010, at 6:14 AM, Christian Pech wrote:
I already reported this problem a week ago, but maybe the message got lost.
The following latex-file produces wrong spacing when compiled with xelatex,
I confirm the bad layout, as reported belo
Hi Christian, and others
On 20/10/2010, at 6:14 AM, Christian Pech wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I already reported this problem a week ago, but maybe the message got lost.
> The following latex-file produces wrong spacing when compiled with xelatex,
I confirm the bad layout, as reported below.
This is
13 matches
Mail list logo
