On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:39:52AM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > On 10/20/2010 10:35 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > >Very useful! Knowing that there were a working version I was able to > >track this down (with some git bisect magic), the culprit is the > >DisplayOperatorMinHeight math parameter, while ago I increased it from > >1400 to 2180 and XeTeX seems not to like that. Now I need to remember > >why this was done in the first place (never use terse commit messages, > >one day you will regret it). > > That was because otherwise the display style operator size in luatex > was too small (essentially outputting a text style operator in all > cases).
Actually I think I now recall, initially I had a composed integral in addition to the two sizes and because of the luatex bug causing it to ignore the last size I was always getting the composite integral for display style and with such small min operator value I was getting tiny display integrals. I've long disabled to composite integral so the issue is no longer relevant, I just tested with 1400 and I get display operators with both luatex and xetex. Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer -------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
