Thank you for valuable suggestions.
Suresh
-Original Message-
From: xetex-boun...@tug.org [mailto:xetex-boun...@tug.org] On Behalf Of Zdenek
Wagner
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 3:24 PM
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Difference between
>>
>> 2. XeLaTeX cannot use microtypographical extensions but it may change
>> in the future. Currently pdflatex or lualatex is needed.
>
> Actually there are already experimental versions of XeTeX lying around
> that have some microtypographical features, see:
> http://xetex.tk/mediawiki/index.
> :
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
>> XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
There can't be any. Both pass the TRIP test.
--
Greetings
Pete
The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for « entrepreneur ».
>
> 2. XeLaTeX cannot use microtypographical extensions but it may change
> in the future. Currently pdflatex or lualatex is needed.
Actually there are already experimental versions of XeTeX lying around
that have some microtypographical features, see:
http://xetex.tk/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Pag
2011/9/21 Suresh Avvarulakshmi, Integra-PDY, IN
:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
> XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
>
I do not know but it can be said quite simply. In any case, it is
Lamport's LaTeX with extensions. The macrolanguage is the
