On 2010-05-31 01:31:40 +0930, Michael Lynch
said:
If you were to use the STIX fonts in the meantime, given the lack of
OpenType features in the STIX release, does it make more sense to use
mathspec instead of unicode-math? I was under the impression that
unicode-math was exclusively designed f
Not really. The glyphs in the mathematical alphabets have different shapes
to the glyphs in the text alphabets. I believe unicode-math is able to
define the alphabets (I don't actually know, but I can't imagine any
hindrance), with or without OpenType math tables, so using unicode-math
would be sup
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 05:01:40PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote:
> On 30/05/2010 15:37, Will Robertson wrote:
> >On 2010-05-30 23:20:07 +0930, Michael Lynch
> > said:
>
> Thanks, I'd only heard of Khaled Hosny's Neo Euler before, so the
> pointer to XITS Math is helpful. This seems to do what I want
On 30/05/2010 15:37, Will Robertson wrote:
On 2010-05-30 23:20:07 +0930, Michael Lynch
said:
Does anyone know any more about the project? Has the math feature
definitely been delayed until a future version?
Yep, the intial release has always been about glyph coverage and
kerning. As they s
On 2010-05-30 23:20:07 +0930, Michael Lynch
said:
Does anyone know any more about the project? Has the math feature
definitely been delayed until a future version?
Yep, the intial release has always been about glyph coverage and
kerning. As they say, OpenType features will come next.
The
