Not really. The glyphs in the mathematical alphabets have different shapes to the glyphs in the text alphabets. I believe unicode-math is able to define the alphabets (I don't actually know, but I can't imagine any hindrance), with or without OpenType math tables, so using unicode-math would be superior to using mathspec here.
Andrew On 31 May 2010 01:31, Michael Lynch <michael.s.ly...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > If you were to use the STIX fonts in the meantime, given the lack of > OpenType features in the STIX release, does it make more sense to use > mathspec instead of unicode-math?
-------------------------------------------------- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
