Hello Mariusz,
I have accidentally deleted your message regarding the underbraces, but it
seems they
work with the old version of unicode-math I have still installed in my system.
See the
attached files.
Kind regards,
A.S.
--
Apostolos Syropoulos
Xanthi, Greece
http://
> Khaled seems to have pinpointed the common source of all of these troubles
> with garbled PDF files. I hope that now somebody contacts Jonathan Kew
> about it.
He reads this list and addresses the outstanding issues on a regular
basis; just leave him the time to do so :-)
Arthur
---
>> > I have had problems like this as well, a while ago, but simply with
>> > fontspec. I had one of Adobe's fonts in both my windows fonts
>> > directory and in the TeX tree (same version btw) and my documents came
>> > out all garbled. Removing the one in windows\fonts fixed it.
>> >
>> > Should
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 10:13:09AM +0300, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:54:56AM +0800, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny
> > wrote:
> > > Looks like xetex is getting glyph indexes from one font file but loading
> > > the actual gl
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Nikos Platis wrote:
> By now this is mostly off-topic, but I checked the test case on
> another computer with TeXLive 2009 x86_64 and get segmentation fault
> as well.
>
> I also just installed TL 2010/pretest (Linux x86_64) and again get the
> segmentation fault.
** Nikos Platis [2010-05-29 01:20:05 +0300]:
> By now this is mostly off-topic, but I checked the test case on
> another computer with TeXLive 2009 x86_64 and get segmentation fault
> as well.
> I also just installed TL 2010/pretest (Linux x86_64) and again get the
> segmentation fault.
> Has an
By now this is mostly off-topic, but I checked the test case on
another computer with TeXLive 2009 x86_64 and get segmentation fault
as well.
I also just installed TL 2010/pretest (Linux x86_64) and again get the
segmentation fault.
Has anyone else tried the file on this architecture?
Nikos Plat
At the very least there should be some warning if different versions of
fonts are being used at different stages, but I suppose this could get
very noisy with the common practice of having at least 3 very
different fonts all claiming to be Helvetica-Italic, so perhaps it needs
to be added to som
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Diederick C. Niehorster
wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
>> Looks like xetex is getting glyph indexes from one font file but loading
>> the actual glyph from another font. Checking the output of 'fc-list :
>> file' my reveal that you
> I've just tested it on Windows 7 x64, with a fully updated MiKTeX 2.8
(MiKTeX-XeTeX 2.8.3758 (0.9995.1 texlive svn 15079) (MiKTeX 2.8)).
>
> I recall having this exact problem before with Asana Math and (possibly)
Neo Euler, but not Cambria Math.
>
> I removed the earlier installed version of uni
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:54:56AM +0800, Diederick C. Niehorster wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > Looks like xetex is getting glyph indexes from one font file but loading
> > the actual glyph from another font. Checking the output of 'fc-list :
> > file' my revea
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> Looks like xetex is getting glyph indexes from one font file but loading
> the actual glyph from another font. Checking the output of 'fc-list :
> file' my reveal that you, or whoever is experiencing this, have several
> version of the font a
On 27/05/2010 09:30, Will Robertson wrote:
On 2010-05-27 17:43:15 +0930, David Cottenden said:
Mildly off topic, but does that mean that the siunitx incompatibility is
solved?
Unfortunately not :(
But I'll take a look (and try and develop a workaround for Joseph if
possible) before I send it
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:51:27PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote:
> On 27/05/2010 17:20, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >Looks like xetex is getting glyph indexes from one font file but loading
> >the actual glyph from another font. Checking the output of 'fc-list :
> >file' my reveal that you, or whoever is e
On 27/05/2010 17:20, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:37:01PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote:
On 27/05/2010 05:55, Will Robertson wrote:
Dear all,
I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an
issue has arisen that I don't know how to debug. It
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 04:37:01PM +0100, Michael Lynch wrote:
> On 27/05/2010 05:55, Will Robertson wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an
> issue has arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is only reproducible
> under Windows
On 27/05/2010 05:55, Will Robertson wrote:
Dear all,
I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has
arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is only reproducible under Windows while using
the Asana Math font; a different font or a different platform gives acce
> Dear all,
>
> I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package,
> but an issue has arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is
> only reproducible under Windows while using the Asana Math font;
> a different font or a different platform gives acceptable output.
>
> The system b
Hello,
I have finally managed to check the input file and there is no problem. As a
matter
of fact, it seems the person who has contacted you has contacted me before
writing
to you about this problem. Also, I can verify that both 32 and 64 bit binaries
produce exactly the same results on OpenSo
Nikos Platis wrote:
Interesting...
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux i386, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, the sample runs fine.
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux x86_64, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, I get a segmentation fault!
This seems to happen when processing unicode
I do not get this bug when doing a compile on windows server 2008, 32
bit version.
windows: Microsoft Windows [Version 6.0.6002]
xelatex: This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8)
Possibly very silly question: did you try this after making sure no
fonts were cached anywhere? =
Interesting...
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux i386, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, the sample runs fine.
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux x86_64, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, I get a segmentation fault!
This seems to happen when processing unicode-math-table.tex, the l
On 2010-05-27 17:43:15 +0930, David Cottenden
said:
Mildly off topic, but does that mean that the siunitx incompatibility is
solved?
Unfortunately not :(
But I'll take a look (and try and develop a workaround for Joseph if
possible) before I send it to CTAN. It is quite a significant proble
Will Robertson wrote:
Dear all,
I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has
arisen that I don't know how to debug.
Mildly off topic, but does that mean that the siunitx incompatibility is
solved?
David
--
David Cottenden
PhD Student
Continence and Skin
24 matches
Mail list logo
