Nikos Platis wrote:
Interesting...
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux i386, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, the sample runs fine.
On a fully updated TeXLive 2009 on Linux x86_64, with XeTeX
3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.2, I get a segmentation fault!
This seems to happen when processing unicode-math-table.tex, the log stops at
There appear to be quite a number of little differences between 64 and
32 bit versions of things. I recall corresponding with Will some time
ago about big symbols not expanding under x64 when using nominally the
same setup was fine in i386.
We (well, Will - I don't know the second thing about it) didn't get it
solved at the time IIRC, but maybe the problems have a common root?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:55, Will Robertson <wsp...@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I am almost to release my long-delayed "unicode-math" package, but an issue has
arisen that I don't know how to debug. It is only reproducible under Windows while using
the Asana Math font; a different font or a different platform gives acceptable output.
The system being used is Windows Vista with:
This is XeTeX, Version 3.1415926-2.2-0.9995.1 (MiKTeX 2.8) (preloaded
format=xelatex 2010.5.20) 25 MAY 2010 16:32
After selecting the maths font, the output is garbled; each glyph is off-by-one:
I've attached a minimal document with all the necessary files to reproduce this
problem. Would anyone (especially with Windows) be able to try this out? Or is
this a known problem that I've forgotten about?
-- Will
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
--
David Cottenden
PhD Student
Continence and Skin Technology Group
UCL
Phone: +44 (0)20 7288 3771
Fax: +44 (0)20 7288 3019
--------------------------------------------------
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
