On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
P.S: Given that Ubuntu provides both 64-bit and 32-bit versions of all the
shared libraries, I did a quick experiment today. I installed the i386-linux
(32-bit) binary for xetex (checked out directly from svn) and gave it a try.
That version works out of
If all else fails with the 64bit binary,
We won't be changing the binaries again for the TL 2010 release, so that
sounds like your only viable alternative.
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listin
On 07/19/2010 04:26 PM, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
these are libz and libfreetype linked statically into the xetex binary.
The shared libfontconfig, however, pulls in a libz.so.1 and
libfreetype.so.6, as shown by 'ldd xetex'. What are their versions?
Hi Peter,
as requested here's the info. I
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
$ xetex --version
XeTeX 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.4 (TeX Live 2010)
kpathsea version 6.0.0
...
Compiled with zlib version 1.2.3; using 1.2.3
Compiled with FreeType2 version 2.3.11; using 2.3.11
Hi Ulrik,
these are libz and libfreetype linked statica
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
The segfault did occur with the latest XeTeX version 0.9997.4.
Updating from 0.9997.3 to 0.9997.4 changed it from segfaulting
immediately when loading unciode-math to segfaulting only in
certain situation, depending on what kind of formulas you t
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010, Karl Berry wrote:
What is the build environment for the x86_64-linux texlive binaries?
I.e.: cross compiling? Which OS/distribution? Which compiler version?
no, nativenone
Peter should answer for sure. The info I have written down from a past
Hi Peter,
I had posted my configuration in an earlier message:
http://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2010-July/026654.html
$ xetex --version
XeTeX 3.1415926-2.2-0.9997.4 (TeX Live 2010)
kpathsea version 6.0.0
Copyright 2010 SIL International and Jonathan Kew.
There is NO warranty. Redistribution of
On 19 July 2010 ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> The segfault did occur with the latest XeTeX version 0.9997.4.
>
> Updating from 0.9997.3 to 0.9997.4 changed it from segfaulting
> immediately when loading unciode-math to segfaulting only in
> certain situation, depending on wh
Hi Peter,
The segfault did occur with the latest XeTeX version 0.9997.4.
Updating from 0.9997.3 to 0.9997.4 changed it from segfaulting
immediately when loading unciode-math to segfaulting only in
certain situation, depending on what kind of formulas you typeset.
> with fontconfig-2.7.3 (libfont
What is the build environment for the x86_64-linux texlive binaries?
I.e.: cross compiling? Which OS/distribution? Which compiler version?
Peter should answer for sure. The info I have written down from a past
year is only: gcc 3.4.6, libc 2.3.6, Linux 2.6.28.6.
-
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 01:41:52AM +0200, Ulrik Vieth wrote:
> Quick Update:
>
> I have finally tried to build xetex from source on my system.
> That version does _not_ segfault unlike the version from TeX Live.
I've found the same (Debian unstable, gcc-4.4).
> That may suggest that the segfaul
Quick Update:
I have finally tried to build xetex from source on my system.
That version does _not_ segfault unlike the version from TeX Live.
That may suggest that the segfault problem may be partly due to
library incompatibilities between different Linux distributions.
(Ubuntu has both 64bit
On 07/12/2010 06:45 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
I have just checked-in a patch to the xetex and texlive source trees
> to fix the xetex segfault that was occurring with \XeTeXdelcode
> on some systems. This brings the xetex version number to 0.9997.4.
Anyone who has been experiencing this problem
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:45:14 +0100
Jonathan Kew wrote:
> I have just checked-in a patch to the xetex and texlive source trees
> to fix the xetex segfault that was occurring with \XeTeXdelcode on
> some systems. This brings the xetex version number to 0.9997.4.
>
> Anyone who has been experienci
Le 12/07/2010 18:45, Jonathan Kew a écrit :
> Anyone who has been experiencing this problem is welcome to build and test
> the new version to confirm that the crash no longer occurs; obviously, I have
> not been able to test it personally on all possible systems and
> configurations.
>
Fwiw, it fi
On 12 July 2010 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
> Le 12/07/2010 10:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de a écrit :
> > I wouldn't assume that the problem is with dynamic linking per se.
>
> The crash has probably nothing to do with dynamic linking
> indeed. Reinhard was replying to this paragraph:
>
>
\setromanfont{XITS}
\setmathfont{XITS Math}
For the future: it is much easier to debug problems (any problems) if
they can be reproduced using fonts that are included in TL. Installing
system fonts is not easy, versions are likely to be different, etc.
At any rate, hoping that Jonathan
I have just checked-in a patch to the xetex and texlive source trees to fix the
xetex segfault that was occurring with \XeTeXdelcode on some systems. This
brings the xetex version number to 0.9997.4.
Anyone who has been experiencing this problem is welcome to build and test the
new version to c
Le 12/07/2010 10:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de a écrit :
> I wouldn't assume that the problem is with dynamic linking per se.
The crash has probably nothing to do with dynamic linking indeed. Reinhard was
replying to this paragraph:
> Would it be a feasible idea to supply Linux32 binaries for XeTeX on
2010/7/12 Martin Schröder :
> 2010/7/12 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard :
>> so I think his answer is that it is *not* doable to ship 32 bit XeTeX on
>> LinUX64, since the user would need a 32-bit version of the dynamically linked
>> libraries.
>
> Which is the norm on OpenSUSE. :-)
>
RHEL based distributi
2010/7/12 Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard :
> so I think his answer is that it is *not* doable to ship 32 bit XeTeX on
> LinUX64, since the user would need a 32-bit version of the dynamically linked
> libraries.
Which is the norm on OpenSUSE. :-)
Best
Martin
On 12 Jul 2010, at 09:21, ulrik.vi...@arcor.de wrote:
>
> I did check with ldd, but I don't have the exact ouput at hand.
> AFAIK, the XeTeX-modified ICU library was statically linked.
> Only stuff like fontconfig or zlib was dynamically linked.
>
> I am running Ubuntu 10.4 on AMD 64, but I hav
] [tex-live] TeXLive Pretest - XeTeX segfaults on LInux 64
> On 12 July 2010 Ulrik Vieth wrote:
>
> > Would it be a feasible idea to supply Linux32 binaries for XeTeX on
> > Linux64 platforms? Would this work at all or would this require
> > additional infrastructure
On 12 July 2010 Ulrik Vieth wrote:
> Would it be a feasible idea to supply Linux32 binaries for XeTeX on
> Linux64 platforms? Would this work at all or would this require
> additional infrastructure (e.g. 32 bit versions of libraries)?
I assume that the problem is that XeTeX is dynamically lin
24 matches
Mail list logo
