Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9] x86/altp2m: support for setting restrictions for an array of pages

2017-12-13 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mi, 2017-12-13 at 01:47 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 13.12.17 at 08:12, wrote: > > @@ -4619,6 +4623,38 @@ static int do_altp2m_op( > > a.u.set_mem_access.view); > > break; > > > > +case HVMOP_altp2m_set_mem_access_multi

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13] x86/emulate: Send vm_event from emulate

2019-09-24 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mon, 2019-09-23 at 15:05 +0300, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > A/D bit writes (on page walks) can be considered benign by an > introspection > agent, so receiving vm_events for them is a pessimization. We try > here to > optimize by filtering these events out. > Currently, we are fully emulati

Re: [Xen-devel] [VMI] Possible race-condition in altp2m APIs

2019-05-10 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 09/05/2019 18:46, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > > > I have some plans to replace it with something far more usable, as > part > of tying together some XTF-based VMI testing, but none of that is > remotely ready yet. Hi Andrew, Did yo

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Per vcpu vm_event channels

2019-05-31 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-05-30 at 08:27 -0700, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 7:18 AM Petre Pircalabu > wrote: > > > > This patchset adds a new mechanism of sending synchronous vm_event > > requests and handling vm_event responses without using a ring. > > As each synchronous request pauses

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/9] vm_event: Move struct vm_event_domain to vm_event.c

2019-06-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:44 -0700, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/05/2019 07:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > The vm_event_domain members are not accessed outside vm_event.c so > > it's > > better to hide de implementation details. > > > > Signed-off-by: Petre Pircalabu > > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Per vcpu vm_event channels

2019-06-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:25 -0700, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/05/2019 07:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > This patchset adds a new mechanism of sending synchronous vm_event > > requests and handling vm_event responses without using a ring. > > As each synchronous request pauses the vcpu until the c

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5/9] vm_event: Simplify vm_event interface

2019-06-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 17:06 -0700, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 31/05/2019 16:43, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 30/05/2019 07:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > The domain reference can be part of the vm_event_domain structure > > > because for every call to a vm_event interface function both the > > > la

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/9] vm_event: Define VM_EVENT type

2019-06-04 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:26 -0700, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/05/2019 07:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > > This is an internal helper, so can reasonably be expected to not be > called with junk, and can do away with the param pointer. > > Something like > > static int xc_vm_event_ring_pfn_pa

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] tools/libxc: Consistent usage of xc_vm_event_* interface

2019-06-04 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 16:01 -0700, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/05/2019 07:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > Modified xc_mem_paging_enable to use directly xc_vm_event_enable > > and > > moved the ring_page handling from client to libxc (xenpaging). > > > > Restricted vm_event_control usage only to si

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-06-05 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 15:43 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/05/2019 15:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Petre Pircalabu > > There are a number of concerns here. > > First and foremost, why is a new domctl being added? Surely this > should > just be a "type of ring access"

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/9] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-06-06 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 02:37 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 05.06.19 at 19:01, wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 15:43 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 30/05/2019 15:18, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > > +static int vm_event_channels_alloc_buffer(struct > > > > vm_event_channels_domain *

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XTF v2 0/4] Add monitor tests to XTF

2019-01-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 13:24 +, Wei Liu wrote: > I think you've called get_maintainers.pl on the wrong files -- it is > not > applicable to xtf.git. > > Wei. Oh, sorry about that. I will be more careful in the future. //Petre ___ Xen-devel mailing l

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XTF v2 4/4] xtf: Add monitor mem_access test

2019-01-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 07:27 -0700, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > +static int mem_access_init() > > +{ > > +int rc = 0; > > +mem_access_monitor_t *pmon = (mem_access_monitor_t *)monitor; > > + > > +if ( !pmon ) > > +return -EINVAL; > > + > > +rc = xc_domain_set_access_required(m

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XTF v2 3/4] xtf: Add monitor test class

2019-01-03 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 13:43 +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 08:42:41PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > > > > define all_sources > > - find include/ arch/ common/ tests/ -name "*.[hcsS]" > > + find include/ arch/ common/ tests/ monitor/ -name "*.[hcsS]" > > endef > > No

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] vm_event: Use slotted channels for sync requests.

2019-01-08 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 12:05 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > > > The memory for the asynchronous ring and the synchronous channels > > will > > be allocated from domheap and mapped to the controlling domain > > using the > > foreignmemory_map_resource interface. Unlike

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/6] tools/libxc: Define VM_EVENT type

2019-01-08 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 11:11 +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 08:52:05PM +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > Define the type for each of the supported vm_event rings (paging, > > monitor and sharing) and replace the ring param field with this > > type. > > > > Replace XEN_DOMCTL_VM_EVE

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] vm_event: Use slotted channels for sync requests.

2019-01-08 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 15:08 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > > > Also, for the current vm_event implementation, other than using the > > hvm_params to specify the ring page gfn, I couldn't see any reason > > why > > it should be limited to HVM guests only. Is it feasible to assume > > the > > v

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] vm_event: Use slotted channels for sync requests.

2019-01-10 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 12:05 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > > > The memory for the asynchronous ring and the synchronous channels > > will > > be allocated from domheap and mapped to the controlling domain > > using the > > foreignmemory_map_resource interface. Unlike

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-31 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 14:44 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.07.2019 15:59, Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU wrote: > > Before using xenforeignmemory_map_resource I investigated several > > different approaches: > > - Allocate the memory in hypervisor and xc_map_foreign_pages > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] Slotted channels for sync vm_events

2019-02-06 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 20:52 +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > This patchset is a rework of the "multi-page ring buffer" for > vm_events > patch based on Andrew Cooper's comments. > For synchronous vm_events the ring waitqueue logic was unnecessary as > the > vcpu sending the request was blocked until

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] Slotted channels for sync vm_events

2019-02-07 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 11:46 +, George Dunlap wrote: > On 2/6/19 2:26 PM, Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 20:52 +0200, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > This patchset is a rework of the "multi-page ring buffer" for > > > vm_events > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/6] tools/libxc: Define VM_EVENT type

2019-02-11 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-01-08 at 09:25 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 19.12.18 at 19:52, wrote: > > > > @@ -796,7 +787,7 @@ struct xen_domctl_gdbsx_domstatus { > > * EXDEV - guest has PoD enabled > > * EBUSY - guest has or had paging enabled, ring buffer still > > active > > */ > > -#define XE

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 6/6] xc_version: add vm_event interface version

2019-02-12 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-01-09 at 11:11 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > On 1/8/19 6:47 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > On 08.01.19 at 17:37, wrote: > > > > > > On 1/8/19 6:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > On 19.12.18 at 19:52, wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Petre Pircalabu > > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vm_event: Add a new opcode to get VM_EVENT_INTERFACE_VERSION

2019-02-13 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-02-13 at 08:27 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 13.02.19 at 14:25, wrote: > > > > @@ -592,6 +592,19 @@ int vm_event_domctl(struct domain *d, struct > > xen_domctl_vm_event_op *vec, > > { > > int rc; > > > > +if ( vec->op == XEN_VM_EVENT_GET_INTERFACE_VERSION ) > > +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/svm: Always intercept ICEBP

2019-11-26 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 12:03 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > ICEBP isn't handled well by SVM. > > The VMexit state for a #DB-vectored TASK_SWITCH has %rip pointing to > the > appropriate instruction boundary (fault or trap, as appropriate), > except for > an ICEBP-induced #DB TASK_SWITCH, where %rip

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-04 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 10:04 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 03.12.2019 18:10, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > --- a/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/hvm/dm_op.h > > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ struct xen_dm_op_inject_event { > > /* IN - error code (or ~0 to skip) */ > > uint32_

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-04 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 17:10 +, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Like %cr2 for pagefaults, %dr6 contains ancillary information for > debug > exceptions, and needs similar handling. > > For xendevicemodel_inject_event(), no ABI change is needed (although > an API > one would be ideal). Switch from 'cr2'

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools/ocaml: Fix build error with Arch Linux

2019-10-28 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mon, 2019-10-28 at 14:33 +, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 02:21:10AM +0300, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > gcc (GCC) 9.2.0 complains: > > > > xentoollog_stubs.c: In function ‘stub_xtl_ocaml_vmessage’: > > xentoollog_stubs.c:93:16: error: initialization discards ‘const’ > > qua

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 5/6] xen-access: add support for slotted channel vm_events

2018-11-29 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2018-11-28 at 21:24 +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > On 11/28/18 5:29 PM, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Petre Pircalabu > > --- > > > > +static int xenaccess_evtchn_bind(xenaccess_t *xenaccess) > > +{ > +int rc, i = 0; > > + > > +rc = xenaccess_evtchn_bind_port(xenacces

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/6] Slotted channels for sync vm_events

2018-12-20 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 15:33 -0700, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:52 AM Petre Pircalabu > wrote: > > > > This patchset is a rework of the "multi-page ring buffer" for > > vm_events > > patch based on Andrew Cooper's comments. > > For synchronous vm_events the ring waitqueue l

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 3/6] vm_event: Refactor vm_event_domain implementation

2018-12-20 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 15:26 -0700, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:52 AM Petre Pircalabu > wrote: > > > > Decouple the VM Event interface from the ring implementation. > > This will need a much better description. There is also a lot of > churn > that is mostly just mechanica

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 4/6] vm_event: Use slotted channels for sync requests.

2018-12-20 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2018-12-20 at 12:05 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > The memory for the asynchronous ring and the synchronous channels > > will > > be allocated from domheap and mapped to the controlling domain > > using the > > foreignmemory_map_resource interface. Unlike the current > > implementation, > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V8 1/4] x86/mm: Add array_index_nospec to guest provided index values

2020-01-21 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 15:31 +0200, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > This patch aims to sanitize indexes, potentially guest provided > values, for altp2m_eptp[] and altp2m_p2m[] arrays. > > Requested-by: Jan Beulich > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila > Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel > Reviewed-by: Pe

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V8 4/4] x86/mm: Make use of the default access param from xc_altp2m_create_view

2020-01-21 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 15:31 +0200, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > At this moment the default_access param from xc_altp2m_create_view is > not used. > > This patch assigns default_access to p2m->default_access at the time > of > initializing a new altp2m view. > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V8 2/4] x86/altp2m: Add hypercall to set a range of sve bits

2020-01-21 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 15:31 +0200, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > By default the sve bits are not set. > This patch adds a new hypercall, xc_altp2m_set_supress_ve_multi(), > to set a range of sve bits. > The core function, p2m_set_suppress_ve_multi(), does not break in > case > of a error and it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V8 3/4] x86/mm: Pull vendor-independent altp2m code out of p2m-ept.c and into p2m.c

2020-01-21 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 13:31 +, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > No functional changes. > > Requested-by: Jan Beulich > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich > Reviewed-by: Petre Pircalabu ___ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-deve

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RESEND] MAINTAINERS: hand over vm_event maintainership

2019-06-18 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 17:00 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > Remove myself as vm_event maintaner, add Alexandru and Petre as > Bitdefender vm_event maintainers. > > Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru > Acked-by: Petre Pircalabu ___ Xen-devel mailing list

[Xen-devel] vfree crash

2019-06-28 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
Hello, I need your help to pinpoint the root cause of a problem. To my understanding vfree should be used when allocating memory with vmalloc. But, I have the following scenario which results in a XEN crash: - allocate a number of frames using vmalloc (vzalloc) (e.g. using a domctl) and assign th

Re: [Xen-devel] vfree crash

2019-07-01 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 08:29 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Xen-devel On Behalf > > Of Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU > > Sent: 28 June 2019 19:00 > > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper < > > andrew.coop...@citr

Re: [Xen-devel] vfree crash

2019-07-01 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mon, 2019-07-01 at 08:55 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU > > Sent: 01 July 2019 09:46 > > To: Paul Durrant ; > > xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Andrew Cooper > > > > Cc: Alexandru Stef

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] vm_event: Define VM_EVENT type

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 14:59 -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > index 959083d..c48bc21 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > @@ -36,6 +36,37 @@ > > #include "io/rin

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/10] Per vcpu vm_event channels

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 14:45 -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM Petre Pircalabu > wrote: > > > > This patchset adds a new mechanism of sending synchronous vm_event > > requests and handling vm_event responses without using a ring. > > As each synchronous request pause

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] vm_event: Define VM_EVENT type

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 11:49 +0300, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > > On 16.07.2019 20:06, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > @@ -1004,7 +942,7 @@ struct xen_domctl_psr_cmt_op { > >* Enable/disable monitoring various VM events. > >* This domctl configures what events will be reported to helper > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Tue, 2019-07-16 at 15:13 -0600, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:06 AM Petre Pircalabu > wrote: > > > > In high throughput introspection scenarios where lots of monitor > > vm_events are generated, the ring buffer can fill up before the > > monitor > > application gets a cha

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 05/10] vm_event: Move struct vm_event_domain to vm_event.c

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 09:31 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.07.2019 19:06, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > The vm_event_domain members are not accessed outside vm_event.c so > > it's > > better to hide de implementation details. > > > > Signed-off-by: Petre Pircalabu > > Acked-by: Andrew Cooper > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 10:06 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.07.2019 19:06, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > +static void vm_event_channels_free_buffer(struct > > vm_event_channels_domain *impl) > > { > > -vm_event_ring_resume(to_ring(v->domain->vm_event_monitor)); > > +int i; > > + > > +v

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-17 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 16:42 +0300, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > > + > > +out: > > +rc2 = xc_domain_unpause(xch, domain_id); > > +if ( rc1 || rc2 ) > > +{ > > +if ( rc2 ) > > +PERROR("Unable to pause domain\n"); > > + > > +if ( rc1 == 0 ) > > +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-18 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 16:32 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.07.2019 16:41, Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 10:06 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 16.07.2019 19:06, Petre Pircalabu wrote: > > > > +static void vm_eve

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-18 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Thu, 2019-07-18 at 14:44 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.07.2019 15:59, Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU wrote: > > Before using xenforeignmemory_map_resource I investigated several > > different approaches: > > - Allocate the memory in hypervisor and xc_map_foreign_pages > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-19 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 08:26 +, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jan Beulich > > Sent: 19 July 2019 09:22 > > To: Paul Durrant > > Cc: 'Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU' ; > > JulienGrall ; > > Alexandru Stefan ISAILA ; Raz

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-19 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 12:59 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.07.2019 14:37, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > From: Jan Beulich > > > Sent: 19 July 2019 13:32 > > > > > > On 19.07.2019 14:11, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message-

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 07/10] vm_event: Add vm_event_ng interface

2019-07-22 Thread Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU
On Mon, 2019-07-22 at 07:59 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.07.2019 19:40, Petre Ovidiu PIRCALABU wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-07-19 at 12:59 +, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 19.07.2019 14:37, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > > From: Jan Beulich &