Wed, 10 May 2023 00:58:27 +0200 Olaf Hering :
> In my debugging (with v8.0.0) it turned out the three pci_set_word
> causes the domU to hang. In fact, it is just the last one:
>
>pci_set_byte(pci_conf + 0x20, 0x01); /* BMIBA: 20-23h */
>
> It changes the value from 0xc121 to 0x1.
If I disa
On 10.05.2023 02:18, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
> A problem I ran into was that adding book keeping to decompress.c would
> result in either a .data section being added or a .bss.* section. The
> linker would complain about this. And since I am not familiar with this
> code, and why it is this way, I opted
On 10.05.2023 02:18, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
> On Arch Linux kernel decompression will fail when Xen has been unified
> with the kernel and initramfs as a single binary. This change works for
> both streaming and non-streaming ZSTD content.
This could do with better explaining what "unified" means, and
On 09.05.2023 12:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/05/2023 2:18 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>>> This is in order to aid guests of AMD hardware that we have exposed
>>> CPUID faulting to. If they try to modify the Intel MSR that enables
>>> the feature, tri
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 12:41, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > When translating an address that falls inside of a superpage in the
> > IOMMU page tables the fetching of the PTE physical address field
> > wasn't using dma_pte_addr(), which caused the r
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 13:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > The 'i' iterator index stores a pdx, not a pfn, and hence the initial
> > assignation of start (which stores a pfn) needs a conversion from pfn
> > to pdx.
>
> Strictly speaking: Yes. But
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 10:11:05PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, May 09 2023 at 12:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 09:43:39PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Not to the detriment of this patch, but this barrier() and it's comment
> > seem weird vs smp_callin(). Tha
First of all - please don't drop Cc-s when replying. I'm restoring
xen-devel@ here at least.
On 10.05.2023 10:51, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
> On 10/05/2023 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:> On 10.05.2023 02:18, Rafaël Kooi
> wrote:
>>> On Arch Linux kernel decompression will fail when Xen has been unified
>>>
On 10.05.2023 10:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.05.2023 12:41, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> When translating an address that falls inside of a superpage in the
>>> IOMMU page tables the fetching of the PTE physical address field
>>>
On 10.05.2023 10:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.05.2023 13:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> The 'i' iterator index stores a pdx, not a pfn, and hence the initial
>>> assignation of start (which stores a pfn) needs a conversion from p
On 10.05.2023 12:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.05.2023 10:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.05.2023 13:03, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
The 'i' iterator index stores a pdx, not a pfn, and hence the initial
assignation of start
On 03/05/2023 01:36, Vikram Garhwal wrote:
> Update sysctl XEN_SYSCTL_dt_overlay to enable support for dtbo nodes addition
> using device tree overlay.
>
> xl dt-overlay add file.dtbo:
> Each time overlay nodes are added using .dtbo, a new fdt(memcpy of
> device_tree_flattened) is creat
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:00:51PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.05.2023 10:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 09.05.2023 12:41, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >>> When translating an address that falls inside of a superpage in the
> >>
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 12:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 08/05/2023 2:18 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> >>> This is in order to aid guests of AMD hardware that we have exposed
> >>> CPUID faulting to
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 11:06:31AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> > Nowadays AMD supports trapping the CPUID instruction from ring3 to ring0,
>
> Since it's relevant for PV32: Their doc talks about CPL > 0, i.e. not just
> ring 3. Therefore I wonder whe
flight 180596 xen-unstable real [real]
flight 180602 xen-unstable real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180596/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180602/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd6
flight 180601 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180601/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 373a95532a785108f625877d993451d4a6d36713
baseline version:
ovmf 9165a7e95ec6263c04c8b
On 09.05.23 20:46, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 08/05/2023 12:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add the node accounting to the accounting information buffering in
order to avoid having to undo it in case of failure.
This requires to call domain_nbentry_dec() before any changes to the
data base, a
On 10.05.2023 12:52, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:15:31AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.05.2023 12:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2023 2:18 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.05.2023 19:57, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> This is in order to aid guests of AMD hard
On 10.05.2023 12:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:00:51PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.05.2023 10:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.05.2023 12:41, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> When translating an addre
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> More staring at this tomorrow, on a clear head.
Yeah, I'm going to leave it as is. Tried doing a union with bitfields
but doesn't get any prettier.
Next crapola:
The Intel box says now:
[8.138683] sgx: EPC section 0x8020
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:30:24PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> So this map lookup thing is wrong in this case.
Btw, current tree is:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/log/?h=rc1-mtrr
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 2:33 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 05.05.2023 17:35, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 3:01 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04.05.2023 18:56, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 9:11 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andr
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:53 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/hwp.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/hwp.c
> > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> > #include
> > #include
> >
> > +static bool hwp_in_use;
>
> __ro_after_init again, please
On 10.05.2023 15:54, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 2:33 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 05.05.2023 17:35, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 3:01 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> The other issue is that if you select "hwp" as the governor, but HWP
>>> hardware support is not ava
"0 or 1 ... to indicate whether it is capable or incapable, respectively"
is luckily just swapped words. Making this shorter will
make the reading easier.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
---
docs/misc/xenstore-paths.pandoc | 10 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
The main topic of this patch series is the ~/control/feature-balloon
entry used by XAPI, prompted by the report of xe-guest-utilities on
FreeBSD not being able to report the feature when using just libxl on
the host.
First patch is a bit off-topic, but included here because it fixes the
text from
This flag has been in use by XAPI for a long time (was present at creation
of the github xen-api/squeezed repo in 2013), and could be used by other
toolstacks.
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
---
docs/misc/xenstore-paths.pandoc | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/docs/misc/xenst
Like other feature controls it has to be created by the toolstack before
the guest can advertise the feature.
Reported-by: zithro
Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson
---
tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c b/tools/libs/li
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 1:14 PM Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> On a fedora system, if you run `sudo sh install.sh` you break your
> system. The installation clobbers /var/run, a symlink to /run. A
> subsequent boot fails when /var/run and /run are different since
> accesses through /var/run can't find it
flight 180603 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180603/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf e6447d2a08f5ca585816d093e79a01dad3781f98
baseline version:
ovmf 373a95532a785108f6258
On 09/05/2023 5:15 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 17:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 09/05/2023 3:28 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.05.2023 15:04, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/05/2023 7:47 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.05.2023 21:39, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> These BUILD_BUG_ON()
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:07:10PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> xc_domain_getinfolist() internally relies on a sysctl that performs
> a linear search for the domids. Many callers of xc_domain_getinfolist()
> who require information about a precise domid are much better off calling
> xc_domain_
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.05.2023 12:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:00:51PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 10.05.2023 10:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 0
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 05:07:11PM +0100, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
> Move calls that require a information about a single precisely identified
> domain to the new xc_domain_getinfo_single().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD
Thanks,
--
On 09.05.23 21:21, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 08/05/2023 12:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
The maxrequests, node size, number of node permissions, and path length
quota are a little bit special, as they are either active in
transactions only (maxrequests), or they are just per item instead of
On 10.05.23 15:30, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 01:36:41AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
More staring at this tomorrow, on a clear head.
Yeah, I'm going to leave it as is. Tried doing a union with bitfields
but doesn't get any prettier.
Next crapola:
The Intel box says now:
flight 180598 linux-linus real [real]
flight 180605 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180598/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180605/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run
On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 09:10:04AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08.05.23 18:46, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > clang complains about the signed type:
> >
> > implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value
> > from 1 to -1 [-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
> >
> >
flight 180604 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180604/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 6fb2760dc8939b16a906b8e6bb224764907168f3
baseline version:
ovmf e6447d2a08f5ca585816d
flight 180599 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180599/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 saverestore-support-checkfail like 180552
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 15 saveresto
On 10/05/2023 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:> First of all - please don't drop Cc-s
when replying. I'm restoring
xen-devel@ here at least.
Apologies, I didn't notice that replying dropped the Cc-s. Should I send
the emails again with the proper Cc-s?
On 10.05.2023 10:51, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
On 1
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
> > hardware rather closely.
> >
> > We need the features bitmask to indicated fields supported by the actual
> > hardware.
> >
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:43 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > Print HWP-specific parameters. Some are always present, but others
> > depend on hardware support.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk
> > ---
> > v2:
> > Style fixes
> > Declare i outside loop
>
Technically our helper post-dates all of these examples, but it's good cleanup
nevertheless. None of these examples should be using fully locked
test_and_set_bool() in the first place.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Roger Pau Monné
CC: Wei Liu
CC:
On 09/05/2023 3:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.05.2023 16:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 08/05/2023 8:45 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 04.05.2023 21:39, Andrew Cooper wrote:
When adding new words to a featureset, there is a reasonable amount of
boilerplate and it is preforable to split
Hi Ayan,
On 04/05/2023 09:57, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
On 03/05/2023 18:43, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Ayan,
Hi Julien,
On 03/05/2023 17:49, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
On 03/05/2023 08:40, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
Hi Julien,
Title: Did you mean "Enable spin table"?
Yes, that would be more c
Hi,
On 10/05/2023 13:54, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 09.05.23 20:46, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 08/05/2023 12:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add the node accounting to the accounting information buffering in
order to avoid having to undo it in case of failure.
This requires to call domain_nben
flight 180607 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180607/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1
flight 180600 qemu-mainline real [real]
flight 180608 qemu-mainline real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180600/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180608/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-am
On 10/05/2023 02:18, Rafaël Kooi wrote:> I've attempted to get Xen to boot Arch
Linux as a unified EFI binary.
Using https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/efi.html as my source
of information, I've been able to build a unified binary. When trying to
boot the kernel Xen complains that the st
Most users use __skb_frag_set_page()/skb_frag_off_set()/
skb_frag_size_set() to fill the page desc for a skb frag.
Introduce skb_frag_fill_page_desc() to do that.
net/bpf/test_run.c does not call skb_frag_off_set() to
set the offset, "copy_from_user(page_address(page), ...)"
and 'shinfo' being pa
flight 180606 linux-linus real [real]
flight 180612 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180606/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180612/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run
On 10.05.23 23:31, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 10/05/2023 13:54, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 09.05.23 20:46, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Juergen,
On 08/05/2023 12:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
Add the node accounting to the accounting information buffering in
order to avoid having to undo it in case of fai
flight 180611 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/180611/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf f47415e0315e2b0cf7bf1d00634f46deee802227
baseline version:
ovmf 6fb2760dc8939b16a906b
On 10.05.2023 19:30, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
> On 10/05/2023 11:48, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.05.2023 10:51, Rafaël Kooi wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2023 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:> On 10.05.2023 02:18, Rafaël Kooi
>>> wrote:
> --- a/xen/common/decompress.c
> +++ b/xen/common/decompress.c
> @@ -3,
On 10.05.2023 19:49, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:26 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> Extend xen_get_cpufreq_para to return hwp parameters. These match the
>>> hardware rather closely.
>>>
>>> We need the features bitmask to indicated fi
On 10.05.2023 20:11, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 6:43 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>>> --- a/tools/misc/xenpm.c
>>> +++ b/tools/misc/xenpm.c
>>> @@ -708,6 +708,44 @@ void start_gather_func(int argc, char *argv[])
>>> pause();
>>> }
>>>
On 10.05.2023 17:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 03:30:21PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 10.05.2023 12:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 12:00:51PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.05.2023 10:27, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, May 09, 2023 at 0
On 10.05.2023 17:06, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 09/05/2023 5:15 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.05.2023 17:59, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2023 3:28 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.05.2023 15:04, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/05/2023 7:47 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 04.05.2023 21:39,
On 10.05.2023 22:13, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 09/05/2023 3:24 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 09.05.2023 16:03, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2023 8:45 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.05.2023 21:39, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> When adding new words to a featureset, there is a reasonable amount o
On 10.05.2023 21:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Technically our helper post-dates all of these examples, but it's good cleanup
> nevertheless. None of these examples should be using fully locked
> test_and_set_bool() in the first place.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Re
62 matches
Mail list logo
