On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 5:53 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 01.05.2023 21:30, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/hwp.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/hwp.c > > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ > > #include <asm/msr.h> > > #include <acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.h> > > > > +static bool hwp_in_use; > > __ro_after_init again, please.
Of course. (I'd already made the change locally after the earlier ones.) > > --- a/xen/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h > > +++ b/xen/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > > #define ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH (0x0100) > > #define ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH (0x0200) > > #define ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_HWCOORD (0x0800) > > +#define ACPI_PDC_CPPC_NTV_INT (0x1000) > > I can probably live with NTV (albeit I'd prefer NATIVE), but INT is too > ambiguous for my taste: Can at least that become INTR, please? Sounds good. I'm switching to ACPI_PDC_CPPC_NATIVE_INTR. > With at least the minimal adjustments > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> Thank you. Regards, Jason
