On 25.02.2022 16:39, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
Acked-by: Jan Beulich
On 28.02.2022 02:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> Add i.MX lpuart driver and i.MX8QM platform support.
> - lpuart is the uart IP used in i.MX8QM/QXP/93.
> - Very basic i.MX8QM platform support.
>
> Peng Fan (3):
> xen/arm: Add i.MX lpuart driver
> xen/arm: Add i.MX lpuart ear
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen/arm: add i.MX lpuart and i.MX8QM initial
> support
>
> On 28.02.2022 02:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > Add i.MX lpuart driver and i.MX8QM platform support.
> > - lpuart is the uart IP used in i.MX8QM/QXP/93.
> > - Very basic i.MX8QM platform
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 03:38:42PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2022 15:19, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Introduce CodeQL support for Xen and analyze the C, Python and Go
> > files.
> >
> > Note than when analyzing Python or Go we avoid building the hypervisor
> > and only build the tools.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 03:39:22PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/02/2022 15:19, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
>
> I agree with this, but it looks like it wants to be folded into the
> previous patch.
Can do. We also need to add
tools/firmware/xen-dir/xen-root/xe
Hi Peng,
On 28/02/2022 01:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan
Can you give me a link to the specification and/or a similar driver in
Linux?
This would help to review this patch.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
Hi Peng,
On 28/02/2022 01:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan
---
xen/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 18 ++
xen/arch/arm/arm64/debug-imx-lpuart.inc | 48 +
2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 xen/arch/a
Hi Julien,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xen/arm: Add i.MX lpuart driver
>
> Hi Peng,
>
> On 28/02/2022 01:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan
>
> Can you give me a link to the specification and/or a similar driver in Linux?
https://www.nxp.com/webapp/Download?colCode=IMX8QMIEC
Chatper
Hi Peng,
On 28/02/2022 01:07, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
From: Peng Fan
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan
---
xen/arch/arm/Kconfig.debug | 3 +++
xen/arch/arm/platforms/Makefile | 1 +
xen/arch/arm/platforms/imx8qm.c | 44 +
3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
cre
Hi Jan,
On 22/02/2022 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.2022 11:22, Julien Grall wrote:
--- a/xen/common/Makefile
+++ b/xen/common/Makefile
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-y += multicall.o
obj-y += notifier.o
obj-y += page_alloc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_PDX) += pdx.o
+obj-bin-$(CONFIG_HAS_PMAP) += pmap.
From: Julien Grall
We stopped relocating Xen since commit f60658c6ae "xen/arm: Stop
relocating Xen".
At the same time, update the memory layout description.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
xen/arch/arm/include/asm/config.h | 4 +---
xen/arch/arm/mm.c
From: Julien Grall
The boot code expects the regions XEN_VIRT_START, FIXMAP_ADDR(0),
BOOT_FDT_VIRT_START to use the same 0th (arm64 only) and 1st slot.
Add some BUILD_BUG_ON() to confirm that. This is helpful if one wants
to re-order the memory layout.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
xen/arch
From: Julien Grall
Commit 2ac705a59ef5 ("xen/arm32: head: Mark the end of subroutines
with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr(), init_uart() and
__lookup_processor_type(). Add ENDPROC for the benefits of
static analysis tools
From: Julien Grall
Commit 13c03002c5df ("xen/arm64: head: Mark the end of subroutines
with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr() and init_uart(). Add
ENDPROC for the benefits of static analysis tools and the reader.
Signed-off
From: Julien Grall
Commit 13c03002c5df ("xen/arm64: head: Mark the end of subroutines
with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr() and init_uart(). Add
ENDPROC for the benefits of static analysis tools and the reader.
Signed-off
On 28/02/2022 10:08, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Commit 13c03002c5df ("xen/arm64: head: Mark the end of subroutines
with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr() and init_uart(). Add
ENDPROC for the benefits of static
On 28.02.2022 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 22/02/2022 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.02.2022 11:22, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> +/*
>>> + * We cannot use set_fixmap() here. We use PMAP when there is no
>>> direct map,
>>> + * so map_pages_to_xen() called by set_fixmap() needs to map
From: Julien Grall
Since commit 54c4ae18d158 ("xen/arm32: head: Rework and document
launch()"), the boot code is not using the register r12.
So update the documentation to show r12 has no specific purpose.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
xen/arch/arm/arm32/head.S | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 ins
Defaults differ for Arm and x86, not the least because of v2 not even
being security supported on Arm.
Also drop a bogus sentence from gnttab_max_maptrack_frames, which was
presumably mistakenly cloned from gnttab_max_frames (albeit even there
what is being said is neither very precise nor very us
Not even the types were correct, let alone defaults being spelled out or
the purpose of the options actually mentioned in any way.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
+++ b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
@@ -1681,10 +1681,21 @@ one pending bit to be allocated.
Hi Jan,
On 28/02/2022 10:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.02.2022 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
On 22/02/2022 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.2022 11:22, Julien Grall wrote:
+/*
+ * We cannot use set_fixmap() here. We use PMAP when there is no direct
map,
+ * so map_pages_to_xen() ca
On 28.02.2022 11:20, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 28/02/2022 10:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.02.2022 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On 22/02/2022 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.2022 11:22, Julien Grall wrote:
> +/*
> + * We cannot use set_fixmap() here. We use PMAP when ther
Hi Jan,
On 28/02/2022 10:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.02.2022 11:20, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/02/2022 10:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.02.2022 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
On 22/02/2022 15:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.2022 11:22, Julien Grall wrote:
+/*
+ * We cannot use set_fixmap
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
#define FEATURESET_7a1 10 /* 0x0007:1.eax*/
#define FEATURESET_e21a 11 /* 0x8021.eax */
#define FEATURESET_7b1 12 /* 0x0007:1.ebx*/
-#define FE
On 28/02/2022 10:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
> #define FEATURESET_7a1 10 /* 0x0007:1.eax*/
> #define FEATURESET_e21a 11 /* 0x8021.eax */
> #define FE
Hi Julien,
Thanks for reviewing the code.
> On 25 Feb 2022, at 7:46 pm, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 15/02/2022 15:36, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> PCI I/O space are not mapped to dom0 when PCI passthrough is enabled,
>> also there is no vpci trap handler register for IO bar.
>> Remove PC
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> > Add XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH_ASSISTED_xapic and
> > XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH_ASSISTED_x2apic to report accelerated xapic
> > and x2apic, on x86 hardware.
> > No such features are currently imp
flight 168251 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168251/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-amd64-libvirt
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -,15 +,15 @@ static void vmx_install_vlapic_mapping(struct vcpu
> > *v)
> >
> > void vmx_vlapic_msr_c
The result field of struct vscsiif_response is lacking a detailed
definition. Today the Linux kernel internal scsi definitions are being
used, which is not a sane interface for a PV device driver.
Add macros to change that by using today's values in the XEN namespace.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross
flight 168250 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168250/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 168247
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:53:39AM +, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2022 6:31 AM
> >
> > Pass a bool to pass if swiotlb needs to be enabled based on the
> > addressing needs and replace the verbose argument with a set of
> > flags, includin
On 28/02/2022 07:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On 25.02.2022 17:02, Jane Malalane wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 14:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.02.2022 18:29,
On 28/02/2022 07:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> On 25.02.2022 17:02, Jane Malalane wrote:
>> On 24/02/2022 14:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 18.02.2022 18:29,
Hi Roger,
> On 25 Feb 2022, at 8:20 am, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 03:25:18PM +, Rahul Singh wrote:
>> {read,write}{l,q} function argument is different for ARM and x86.
>> ARM {read,wrie}(l,q} function argument is pointer whereas X86
>> {read,wrie}(l,q} function argum
Hi Julien,
On 28.02.2022 11:07, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> Commit 2ac705a59ef5 ("xen/arm32: head: Mark the end of subroutines
> with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
>
> Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr(), init_uart() and
> __lookup_proce
Hi Julien,
On 28.02.2022 11:08, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> Commit 13c03002c5df ("xen/arm64: head: Mark the end of subroutines
> with ENDPROC") intended to mark all the subroutines with ENDPROC.
>
> Unfortunately, I missed fail(), switch_ttbr() and init_uart(). Add
> ENDPROC fo
On 22.02.2022 16:26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ config HAS_AS_CET_SS
> # binutils >= 2.29 or LLVM >= 6
> def_bool $(as-instr,wrssq %rax$(comma)0;setssbsy)
>
> +config HAS_CC_CET_IBT
> + # GCC >= 9 and binutil
Hi Julien,
On 28.02.2022 11:11, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> Since commit 54c4ae18d158 ("xen/arm32: head: Rework and document
> launch()"), the boot code is not using the register r12.
>
> So update the documentation to show r12 has no specific purpose.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julie
On 28.02.2022 13:09, Jane Malalane wrote:
> On 28/02/2022 07:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> [CAUTION - EXTERNAL EMAIL] DO NOT reply, click links, or open attachments
>> unless you have verified the sender and know the content is safe.
>>
>> On 25.02.2022 17:02, Jane Malalane wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2022 14
On 28.02.2022 11:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
>>> Add XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH_ASSISTED_xapic and
>>> XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH_ASSISTED_x2apic to report accelerated xapic
>>> and x2apic, on x86 h
On 28.02.2022 12:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>>> @@ -,15 +,15 @@ static void vmx_install_vlapic_mapping(struct
On 28/02/2022 10:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Not even the types were correct,
Huh yes. c/s 97638f08f4 was plain wrong.
> let alone defaults being spelled out or
> the purpose of the options actually mentioned in any way.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>
> --- a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc
>
On 28/02/2022 13:04, Michal Orzel wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Michal,
Thank you for the review.
On 28.02.2022 11:11, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
Since commit 54c4ae18d158 ("xen/arm32: head: Rework and document
launch()"), the boot code is not using the register r12.
So update the
From: Julien Grall
Since commit 54c4ae18d158 ("xen/arm32: head: Rework and document
launch()"), the boot code is setting r12 but not read it.
So remove the two instructions setting r12 and update the documentation
to show r12 has no specific purpose.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
Change
Hi Julien,
On 28.02.2022 14:35, Julien Grall wrote:
> From: Julien Grall
>
> Since commit 54c4ae18d158 ("xen/arm32: head: Rework and document
> launch()"), the boot code is setting r12 but not read it.
>
> So remove the two instructions setting r12 and update the documentation
> to show r12 has
flight 168254 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168254/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf b1b89f9009f2390652e0061bd7b24fc40732bc70
baseline version:
ovmf f1d1c337e7c0575da7fd2
Hi Jan,
On 28/02/2022 10:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
Defaults differ for Arm and x86, not the least because of v2 not even
being security supported on Arm.
Also drop a bogus sentence from gnttab_max_maptrack_frames, which was
presumably mistakenly cloned from gnttab_max_frames (albeit even there
wha
On 28.02.2022 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 28/02/2022 10:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Defaults differ for Arm and x86, not the least because of v2 not even
>> being security supported on Arm.
>>
>> Also drop a bogus sentence from gnttab_max_maptrack_frames, which was
>> presumably mistakenly cloned
On 28.02.2022 14:19, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/02/2022 10:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Not even the types were correct,
>
> Huh yes. c/s 97638f08f4 was plain wrong.
>
>> let alone defaults being spelled out or
>> the purpose of the options actually mentioned in any way.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan
Hi Jan,
On 28/02/2022 14:32, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.02.2022 15:02, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/02/2022 10:19, Jan Beulich wrote:
Defaults differ for Arm and x86, not the least because of v2 not even
being security supported on Arm.
Also drop a bogus sentence from gnttab_max_maptrack_frames, w
> On Feb 15, 2022, at 8:20 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 14.02.2022 22:50, George Dunlap wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 2021, at 10:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 13.08.2021 13:37, Ian Jackson wrote:
The current policy for minimum supported versions of tools, compilers,
etc. is unsatisfacto
The name of the field doesn't matter because it's use as a YAML achor,
but it's nicer to have the proper spelling.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
automation/gitlab-ci/build.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/automation/gitlab-ci/build.yaml b/automation/gi
Patch series available in this git branch:
https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/people/aperard/xen-unstable.git
br.gitlab-ci-improvement-v1
Allow build and test jobs to run concurently.
Avoid running "test artifact" jobs on branch "master" and other, when test jobs
aren't runned.
Anthony PERARD (4)
Share the same "except" as the one used for tests.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
automation/gitlab-ci/build.yaml | 16 +++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/automation/gitlab-ci/build.yaml b/automation/gitlab-ci/build.yaml
index 26dcfb1c25..cbbe0b834
Allow to set common configuration from a single place for all tests
jobs.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml | 73 --
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml b/automation/gitlab-c
Like with "dependencies", the jobs will get artifacts from the jobs
listed in "needs". But the test jobs can run as soon as the build jobs
listed have finished.
Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD
---
automation/gitlab-ci/test.yaml | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:11:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.02.2022 11:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> >>> Add XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH_ASSISTED_xapic and
> >>> XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_AR
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:14:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.02.2022 12:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>
When overriding the tool chain via CROSS_COMPILE, the resulting
components need to be made available to, in particular (but not limited
to) the check-endbr.sh script. Note that we don't allow overriding
ADDR2LINE yet; this would first require additions to some config/*.mk
before it would make sense
On 28.02.2022 16:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:11:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.02.2022 11:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> Add XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_ARCH
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 05:14:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 28.02.2022 16:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:11:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 28.02.2022 11:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:08:41PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 1
flight 168253 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168253/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 12 debian-hvm-install fail in
168248 pass in 168253
test-armhf-arm
From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 3:31 AM
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:53:39AM +, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
> > From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2022 6:31
> > AM
> > >
> > > Pass a bool to pass if swiotlb needs to be enabled based on the
> > > a
Hi Roger,
The revised patch looks good. The PBA writes seen during ioatdma driver
initialization (self-test) complete successfully and the driver doesn't complain
(I see two interrupts per ioatdma device). The driver has a self-test feature
which appears to exercise MSIX interrupts and has code
On 28/02/2022 07:12, Henry Wang wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hi Henry,
-Original Message-
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2022 4:09 AM
To: Henry Wang ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
sstabell...@kernel.org
Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
; Penny Zheng
Subject: Re: [RFC PATC
Hi George,
Sorry for the late answer.
On 16/02/2022 12:23, George Dunlap wrote:
On Feb 16, 2022, at 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 16.02.2022 12:34, George Dunlap wrote:
I am opposed to overloading “ASSERT” for this new kind of macro; I think it
would not only be unnecessarily confusin
On 2/25/22 8:17 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 2/25/22 2:39 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 2/24/22 4:50 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
This is the v3 of the patch to fix xen kexec kernel panic issue when the
kexec is triggered on VCPU >= 32.
PANIC: early exception 0x0e IP 10:a96679b
CET-IBT depend on executing indirect branches for protections to apply.
Extend the clobber for CET-SS to all of CET.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Roger Pau Monné
CC: Wei Liu
I can't decide if this wants a fixes tag or not. If I'd remembered during the
CET series, it w
flight 168255 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168255/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 168230
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 sav
Hi Boris,
On 2/28/22 12:45 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>
>
> On 2/25/22 8:17 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> On 2/25/22 2:39 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2/24/22 4:50 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
This is the v3 of the patch to fix xen kexec kernel panic issue when the
kex
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> On 28/02/2022 07:12, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Hi Julien,
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Julien Grall
> >> Hi Henry,
> >>
> >> On 24/02/2022 01:30, Henry Wang wrote:
> >>> The reserved Xenheap, or statically
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Henry Wang
> Sent: 2022年3月1日 10:11
> To: Julien Grall ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org;
> sstabell...@kernel.org
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen
> ; Penny Zheng
> Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce reserved Xenheap
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> >
flight 168258 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168258/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64
Hi Boris,
On 2/28/22 5:18 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 2/28/22 12:45 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/25/22 8:17 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
>>> Hi Boris,
>>>
>>> On 2/25/22 2:39 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 2/24/22 4:50 PM, Dongli Zhang wrote:
> This is the v3 of
flight 168262 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168262/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64
flight 168256 linux-linus real [real]
flight 168261 linux-linus real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168256/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168261/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-
flight 168267 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/168267/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: 2022年2月26日 4:12
> To: Wei Chen ; Stefano Stabellini
>
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Bertrand Marquis
> ; Penny Zheng ; Henry Wang
> ; nd
> Subject: Re: Proposal for Porting Xen to Armv8-R64 - DraftA
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> O
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-amd64-xsm
testid xen-build
Tree: ovmf https://github.com/tianocore/edk2.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-traditional.git
Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen.git
Tree: seabios git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/seabios.git
Tree: xe
On 28.02.2022 19:19, Alex Olson wrote:
> FYI, with this patch, I was seeing msix_read() and msix_write() being called
> during the driver's self-test on physical address 0xfbc01800, corresponding to
> the beginning of the PBA (lspci excerpt below):
>
>
> 02:00.0 System peripheral: Intel Corpora
On 28.02.2022 17:31, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 05:14:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.02.2022 16:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:11:04PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.02.2022 11:59, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 0
Hi Julien,
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Grall
> Sent: 2022年2月26日 4:55
> To: Wei Chen ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Stefano
> Stabellini
> Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Penny Zheng
> ; Henry Wang ; nd
> Subject: Re: Proposal for Porting Xen to Armv8-R64 - DraftA
>
> Hi Wei,
>
> Tha
On 28.02.2022 16:48, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:14:26PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.02.2022 12:20, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.02.2022 18:29, Jane Malalane wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/
84 matches
Mail list logo
