[libvirt test] 163295: regressions - FAIL

flight 163295 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163295/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-amd64-libvirt

[qemu-mainline test] 163292: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 163292 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163292/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail like 152631 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd6

[xen-unstable-coverity test] 163297: all pass - PUSHED

flight 163297 xen-unstable-coverity real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163297/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: xen 74d044d51b19bb697eac5c3deafa140f6afafec8 baseline version: xen f95b

[ovmf test] 163294: regressions - FAIL

flight 163294 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163294/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[ovmf test] 163298: regressions - FAIL

flight 163298 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163298/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[xen-unstable test] 163293: tolerable FAIL

flight 163293 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163293/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 163239 pass in 163293 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-v

[linux-linus test] 163296: regressions - FAIL

flight 163296 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163296/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-qem

[ovmf test] 163300: regressions - FAIL

flight 163300 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163300/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[qemu-mainline test] 163299: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 163299 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163299/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail like 163292 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd6

[ovmf test] 163302: regressions - FAIL

flight 163302 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163302/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

[linux-linus test] 163301: regressions - FAIL

flight 163301 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163301/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-xsm7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-qem

[ovmf test] 163304: regressions - FAIL

flight 163304 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163304/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu

RE: [PATCH 2/9] xen/arm: introduce PGC_reserved

Hi Julien Sorry for so long to respond, just back from a long holiday. 😉 > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall > Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 1:44 AM > To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org; jbeul...@suse.com > Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen > >

RE: [PATCH 3/9] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_STATIC_ALLOCATION

Hi Julien > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall > Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 1:45 AM > To: Penny Zheng ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org; jbeul...@suse.com > Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] xen/arm: introduce CONFIG_STATIC_ALLOC

Re: [XEN PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Updating after change to tools/include/

On 01.07.21 17:52, Anthony PERARD wrote: The LIBS section doesn't mention the headers associated with the libraries, same for LIBXENLIGHT section. They aren't any ':' in other section names, so remove it. Fixes: 4664034cdc72 ("tools/libs: move official headers to common directory") Fixes: f7079

[qemu-mainline test] 163303: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

flight 163303 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163303/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 20 debian-hvm-install/l1/l2 fail like 163299 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd6

RE: [PATCH 4/9] xen/arm: static memory initialization

Hi Julien and Jan > -Original Message- > From: Julien Grall > Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2021 1:46 AM > To: Jan Beulich ; Penny Zheng > Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen > ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xen/arm: static memory initializati

[PATCH v4] arm64: Change type of hsr, cpsr, spsr_el1 to uint64_t

AArch64 registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 registers are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32 in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG. We should also use register_t type when reading sysregs which can correspond to uint64_t or uint32