On 28.06.20 10:50, Jürgen Groß wrote:
Ping?
On 10.06.20 16:10, Juergen Gross wrote:
efifb_probe() will issue an error message in case the kernel is booted
as Xen dom0 from UEFI as EFI_MEMMAP won't be set in this case. Avoid
that message by calling efi_mem_desc_lookup() only if EFI_PARAVIRT
isn'
On 09.07.2020 07:56, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> Yesterday's design session at Xen Developer Summit "Hypervisor Team: .."
> had one topic regarding whether we should find specific maintainers of
> all the files currently assigned to "THE REST" in order to lower the
> amount of reviews for those assigned t
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 07:56:58AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> Yesterday's design session at Xen Developer Summit "Hypervisor Team: .."
> had one topic regarding whether we should find specific maintainers of
> all the files currently assigned to "THE REST" in order to lower the
> amount of reviews
> On 8 Jul 2020, at 14:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 12:55:36PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here are the notes we took during the design session around PCI devices
>> passthrough on Arm.
>> Feel free to comment or add anything :-)
>>
>> Bertrand
>>
>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 10:29:52AM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
>
>
> > On 8 Jul 2020, at 14:32, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 12:55:36PM +, Bertrand Marquis wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Here are the notes we took during the design session around PCI devices
> >> p
flight 151740 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151740/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail in 151719 pass in
151740
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-s
Hi,
Gentle ping.
Is the new commit message fine?
Cheers,
On 04/07/2020 16:29, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 27/06/2020 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
From: Julien Grall
The specification of pvcalls suggests there is padding for 32-bit x86
at the end of most the structure. However, they are not d
flight 151744 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151744/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install
fail REGR. vs. 15106
flight 151747 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151747/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 151214
test-amd64-amd64-x
flight 151754 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151754/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-pair 22 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR.
vs. 151496
test-amd64-i38
From: Julien Grall
XenStore response can be bigger than the response ring. In this case,
it is possible to have the ring full (e.g cons = 19 and prod = 1043).
However, XTF will consider that there is no data and therefore wait for
more input. This will result to block indefinitely as the ring is
flight 151757 linux-5.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151757/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 151516
Tests which did not succeed, b
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Gentle ping.
>
> Is the new commit message fine?
>
> Cheers,
>
> On 04/07/2020 16:29, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 27/06/2020 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > From: Julien Grall
> > >
> > > The specification of pvcalls suggests ther
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at drivers/xen/preempt.c:37
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 20775, name: xl
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 1 PID: 20775 Comm: xl Tainted: G D W
5.4.46-1_prgmr_debug.el7.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x8f
flight 151759 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151759/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 151740
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64
flight 151763 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151763/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.
151065
test-amd64-amd
On 10.07.20 03:38, Sarah Newman wrote:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
drivers/xen/preempt.c:37
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 20775, name: xl
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
CPU: 1 PID: 20775 Comm: xl Tainted: G D W
5.4.46-1_prgmr_debug.e
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, 22:43 Stefano Stabellini,
wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Gentle ping.
> >
> > Is the new commit message fine?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > On 04/07/2020 16:29, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 27/06/2020 10:55, Julien Grall wrote:
> > >
flight 151764 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/151764/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-arm64-arm64-libvirt-xsm 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 151214
build-i386-pvops
19 matches
Mail list logo
