flight 133510 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133510/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in
133474 pass in 133510
test-amd64
flight 133512 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133512/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 133460
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saveresto
flight 133557 xen-unstable-coverity real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133557/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
xen f393b82fe5ba3ed9cfe2b306ffa53368e55b75af
baseline version:
xen e72e
flight 133517 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133517/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 5 host-ping-check-native fail REGR. vs. 133300
test-armhf-armhf-x
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64
testid xen-boot
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
Tree: qemu git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-tradition
flight 133530 linux-4.19 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133530/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 12 guest-start/redhat.repeat fail REGR. vs.
129313
Tests which
Hi,
I’m using the NXP i.mx8qxp men board and want to create an Android domu
on Xen,
but this board doesn’t have IOMMU. Does anyone knows that can I
passthrough GPU without IOMMU on it?
Thanks.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@list
Hi,
> This series introduces a cacheability parameter for the iomem option, so
> that we can map an iomem region into a guest as cacheable memory.
>
> Then, this series fixes the way Xen handles reserved memory regions on
> ARM: they should be mapped as normal memory, instead today they are
> trea
flight 133539 linux-3.18 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133539/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 xen-bootfail REGR. vs. 128858
test-amd64-i386-xl-q
flight 133542 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133542/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win10-i386 broken in 133314
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-d
flight 133552 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133552/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail in
133503 pass in 133552
test-amd64-a
flight 133555 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/133555/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-rumprun-amd64 17 rumprun-demo-xenstorels/xenstorels.repeat
fail like 133510
test-amd64-i386-qemut-
> From: Paul Durrant
> Sent: Saturday, March 2, 2019 12:41 AM
>
> Hi,
>
> As the basis of some future development work I've put together a simple
> standalone emulator to pass through a single type 0 PCI function to a guest so
> I'm posting here in case anyone else would like a give it a try. S
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 83697 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/83697/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64
On 02/28/19 at 11:45am, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:32:14 +0800 Dave Young wrote:
>
> > This series have been in -next for some days, could we get this in
> > mainline?
>
> It's been in -next for two months?
Should be around 3 months
>
> > Andrew, do you have plan about the
On 04/03/2019 07:21, Dave Young wrote:
> On 02/28/19 at 11:45am, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 13:32:14 +0800 Dave Young wrote:
>>
>>> This series have been in -next for some days, could we get this in
>>> mainline?
>>
>> It's been in -next for two months?
>
> Should be around 3 mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
