On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for
> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least
> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later.
>
> Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on
> "lib
On 25.03.2020 12:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/03/2020 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for
>> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least
>> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later.
>>
>> Patch 1 funct
On 24/03/2020 12:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for
> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least
> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later.
>
> Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on
> "libx
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich
> Sent: 24 March 2020 12:43
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant ;
> Wei Liu ;
> Roger Pau Monne
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] x86emul: further work
>
> Paul,On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > Some of
Paul,On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for
> varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least
> some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later.
>
> Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on
>
