On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote: > Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for > varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least > some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later. > > Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on > "libx86/CPUID: fix (not just) leaf 7 processing", while at > least patch 2 contextually depends on "x86emul: disable > FPU/MMX/SIMD insn emulation when !HVM". > > 1: x86emul: support AVX512_BF16 insns
Thanks for the ack on patch 1, which I've just pushed, but may I also ask for an ack or otherwise on the (test harness) prereq named above, and ideally also the other patch named there? Thanks, Jan