On 23.09.2019 11:00, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> Ok, just to make sure this is what is needed and limit the patch
> versions, rep_movs / rep_stos should have a switch like this:
>
> switch ( rc )
> {
> case HVMTRANS_okay:
> return X86EMUL_OKAY;
>
On 20.09.2019 18:20, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.2019 16:59, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20.09.2019 17:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 20.09.2019 14:16, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
In order to have __hvm_copy() issue ~X86EMUL_RETRY a new return type,
HVMTRANS_need_retr
On 20.09.2019 16:59, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>
>
> On 20.09.2019 17:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 20.09.2019 14:16, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>>> In order to have __hvm_copy() issue ~X86EMUL_RETRY a new return type,
>>> HVMTRANS_need_retry, was added and all the places that consume HVM
On 20.09.2019 17:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.09.2019 14:16, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
>> In order to have __hvm_copy() issue ~X86EMUL_RETRY a new return type,
>> HVMTRANS_need_retry, was added and all the places that consume HVMTRANS*
>> and needed adjustment where changed accordingly.
>
On 20.09.2019 14:16, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> In order to have __hvm_copy() issue ~X86EMUL_RETRY a new return type,
> HVMTRANS_need_retry, was added and all the places that consume HVMTRANS*
> and needed adjustment where changed accordingly.
This is wrong and hence confusing: __hvm_copy()
