On 26/03/2019 14:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.03.19 at 15:23, wrote:
>> IMO especially in the CPUID case it is desirable to explicitly specify
>> the width of the data. Looking at nodes 0x8002 and following this
>> should be rather clear (and I even think get_model_name() should be
>> mod
>>> On 26.03.19 at 15:47, wrote:
> On 26/03/2019 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.03.19 at 15:23, wrote:
>>> IMO especially in the CPUID case it is desirable to explicitly specify
>>> the width of the data. Looking at nodes 0x8002 and following this
>>> should be rather clear (and I even
On 26/03/2019 15:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.03.19 at 15:23, wrote:
>> IMO especially in the CPUID case it is desirable to explicitly specify
>> the width of the data. Looking at nodes 0x8002 and following this
>> should be rather clear (and I even think get_model_name() should be
>> mod
>>> On 26.03.19 at 15:23, wrote:
> IMO especially in the CPUID case it is desirable to explicitly specify
> the width of the data. Looking at nodes 0x8002 and following this
> should be rather clear (and I even think get_model_name() should be
> modified to use a pointer to uint32_t instead of
On 26/03/2019 15:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.03.19 at 14:11, wrote:
>> On 26/03/2019 11:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.03.19 at 13:21, wrote:
Also introduce constants for the vendor strings in CPUID leaf 0.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
>>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
>>>
>>> On 26.03.19 at 14:11, wrote:
> On 26/03/2019 11:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 21.03.19 at 13:21, wrote:
>>> Also introduce constants for the vendor strings in CPUID leaf 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
>> albeit I'd appreciate if this was committed toge
On 26/03/2019 11:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.03.19 at 13:21, wrote:
>> Also introduce constants for the vendor strings in CPUID leaf 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
> albeit I'd appreciate if this was committed together with an actual
> user (other than the
>>> On 21.03.19 at 13:21, wrote:
> Also introduce constants for the vendor strings in CPUID leaf 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
albeit I'd appreciate if this was committed together with an actual
user (other than the testsuite one) of the new function, and
despite
