Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: introduce APIC_VECTOR_VALID

2025-03-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.03.2025 00:42, Denis Mukhin wrote: > On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 1:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 15.03.2025 02:00, dm...@proton.me wrote: >> >>> Add new symbol APIC_VECTOR_VALID to replace open-coded value 16 in >>> LAPIC and virtual LAPIC code. >> >> >> First a good name is needed to m

Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: introduce APIC_VECTOR_VALID

2025-03-18 Thread Denis Mukhin
On Monday, March 17th, 2025 at 1:30 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > On 15.03.2025 02:00, dm...@proton.me wrote: > > > Add new symbol APIC_VECTOR_VALID to replace open-coded value 16 in > > LAPIC and virtual LAPIC code. > > > First a good name is needed to make such a change. APIC_VECTOR_VALID > coul

Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq: introduce APIC_VECTOR_VALID

2025-03-17 Thread Jan Beulich
On 15.03.2025 02:00, dm...@proton.me wrote: > Add new symbol APIC_VECTOR_VALID to replace open-coded value 16 in > LAPIC and virtual LAPIC code. First a good name is needed to make such a change. APIC_VECTOR_VALID could imo be the name of a predicate macro, but it can't be a mere number. Then ...