On 12/13/18 4:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.12.18 at 14:18, wrote:
>> So, long story short, on VMX we first send out the vm_event, while
>> processing it an interrupt / exception may become pending, before
>> resuming the VCPU that has sent out the vm_event there's a Xen function
>> that pi
>>> On 13.12.18 at 14:18, wrote:
> So, long story short, on VMX we first send out the vm_event, while
> processing it an interrupt / exception may become pending, before
> resuming the VCPU that has sent out the vm_event there's a Xen function
> that picks up the pending interrupt and schedules it
On 12/13/18 2:39 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/18 12:15 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 12/13/18 2:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 12/13/18 8:03 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdef
Hi,
On 12/13/18 12:15 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/13/18 2:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 12/13/18 8:03 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM
In any case, I
On 12/13/18 2:04 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/13/18 8:03 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM
> In any case, I think you want to rename t
Hi,
On 12/13/18 8:03 AM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM
In any case, I think you want to rename the function and/or document
more that expected behavior.
You're
On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM
>>
>>> In any case, I think you want to rename the function and/or document
>>> more that expected behavior.
>>
>> You're right, I should probably rename t
> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM
>
> > In any case, I think you want to rename the function and/or document
> > more that expected behavior.
>
> You're right, I should probably rename that function / variable to
> better reflect
On 12/11/18 1:59 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/12/2018 10:21, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 12/11/18 12:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01:53PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/10/18 6:59 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau
Hi,
On 11/12/2018 10:21, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/11/18 12:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01:53PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/10/18 6:59 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razv
On 12/11/18 12:14 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01:53PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> On 12/10/18 6:59 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>> On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> diff --git a/xen
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01:53PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 12/10/18 6:59 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> > On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
> >>> b/xen/include
On 12/10/18 6:59 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
>>> index 66f2474..b63249e 100644
>>> --- a/xen/include/asm-
On 12/10/18 6:49 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
>> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
>> index 66f2474..b63249e 100644
>> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_eve
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:01:49PM +0200, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
> index 66f2474..b63249e 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/vm_event.h
> @@ -52,4 +52,10 @@ void vm_event_emulate_ch
Block interrupts (in vmx_intr_assist()) for the duration of
processing a sync vm_event (similarly to the strategy
currently used for single-stepping). Otherwise, attempting
to emulate an instruction when requested by a vm_event
reply may legitimately need to call e.g.
hvm_inject_page_fault(), which
16 matches
Mail list logo
