On 12/13/18 8:54 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 8:33 PM >> >>> In any case, I think you want to rename the function and/or document >>> more that expected behavior. >> >> You're right, I should probably rename that function / variable to >> better reflect what it signifies - that sync vm_event processing is in >> progress. For VMX and SVM, that simply means that interrupts will be >> blocked, and the value of the variable will be correct and possibly >> useful for ARM as well. >> > > what about vm_event_block_interrupt_injection? in that case > it's injection instead of interrupt itself being blocked. blocking > injection should mean same thing cross archs?
Of course, if Julien agrees with the change I'll rename it as suggested. Thanks, Razvan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
