On 26.04.19 17:06, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/2019 14:49, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 25.04.19 23:42, Julien Grall wrote:
I am not sure why I use A.k because this is a pretty old spec.
I did mean that A.k. is not publicly available, even now, so it is not quite
right to refer such a do
Hi,
On 26/04/2019 14:49, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 25.04.19 23:42, Julien Grall wrote:
I am not sure why I use A.k because this is a pretty old spec.
I did mean that A.k. is not publicly available, even now, so it is not quite
right to refer such a document, at least without mentioning it is i
On 25.04.19 23:42, Julien Grall wrote:
I am not sure why I use A.k because this is a pretty old spec.
I did mean that A.k. is not publicly available, even now, so it is not quite
right to refer such a document, at least without mentioning it is internal.
I should
have used the last one (i.e
On 25/04/2019 19:01, Andrii Anisov wrote:
>
>
> On 17.04.19 20:58, Julien Grall wrote:
>> All the TLBs helpers invalidate all the TLB entries are using the same
>> pattern:
>> DSB SY
>> TLBI ...
>> DSB SY
>> ISB
>>
>> This pattern is following pattern recommended by the Arm
On 17.04.19 20:58, Julien Grall wrote:
All the TLBs helpers invalidate all the TLB entries are using the same
pattern:
DSB SY
TLBI ...
DSB SY
ISB
This pattern is following pattern recommended by the Arm Arm to ensure
visibility of updates to translation tables (see K10-5610
All the TLBs helpers invalidate all the TLB entries are using the same
pattern:
DSB SY
TLBI ...
DSB SY
ISB
This pattern is following pattern recommended by the Arm Arm to ensure
visibility of updates to translation tables (see K10-5610 in ARM DDI
0487.A.k).
We have been a bit too
