On 26.04.19 17:06, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 26/04/2019 14:49, Andrii Anisov wrote:
On 25.04.19 23:42, Julien Grall wrote:
I am not sure why I use A.k because this is a pretty old spec.
I did mean that A.k. is not publicly available, even now, so it is not quite
right to refer such a document, at least without mentioning it is internal
Please avoid to take my words out of context... As you read the sentence above,
you probably noticed that A.k was published with defects in it and probably the
reasons why it can't be found today.
I download all my specs from public website to avoid potential disclosure of
internal content. If you look at Google, the spec was actually public at some
point (see [1] for instance).
I understand that. But now, at this patch publication and review moment, the
A.k. document is not available. And is a bit confusing.
In what you quote, I merely pointed out that I should not have used it because
it is pretty old (~2 and half years).
Referring the most up-to-date document is alway a good choice.
--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
