>>> On 19.06.19 at 22:11, wrote:
> * Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
>__attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain such
>annotations for link time warnings.
> * Adjust the indentation of the start of ARM's .rodata section.
> * Discard .
Hi Andrew,
On 6/19/19 10:38 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 19/06/2019 22:30, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi,
On 6/19/19 9:11 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
* Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
__attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain
such
annota
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 09:11:27PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> * Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
>__attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain such
>annotations for link time warnings.
> * Adjust the indentation of the start of ARM's .r
On 19/06/2019 22:30, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/19/19 9:11 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> * Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
>> __attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain
>> such
>> annotations for link time warnings.
>
> What if th
Hi,
On 6/19/19 9:11 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
* Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
__attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain such
annotations for link time warnings.
What if this is introduced? How do we catch it?
* Adjust the ind
* Drop .gnu.warning. Xen, not being a library, has no need for
__attribute__((__warning__("str"))) and isn't liable to ever gain such
annotations for link time warnings.
* Adjust the indentation of the start of ARM's .rodata section.
* Discard .discard on ARM.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Coope
