On 30/08/18 10:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.08.18 at 10:31, wrote:
>> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
>
On 30/08/18 10:44, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 30.08.18 at 10:37, wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
> fi
>>> On 30.08.18 at 10:37, wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
>> >> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
>> >> filled rather weird: the size of the array
>>> On 30.08.18 at 10:31, wrote:
> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
>>> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
>>> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
>>> online cpu number, while the data is set
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 10:31:16AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
> >> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
> >> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
> >> online
On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
>> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
>> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
>> online cpu number, while the data is set to "invalid" for not present
>> cpus on
>>> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, wrote:
> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
> online cpu number, while the data is set to "invalid" for not present
> cpus only.
>
> With smt=0 the information for par
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 08:48:40AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
> > filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
> > online cpu number, while the
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:23:02PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
> online cpu number, while the data is set to "invalid" for not present
> cpus only.
>
> With
The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is
filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest
online cpu number, while the data is set to "invalid" for not present
cpus only.
With smt=0 the information for parked threads is all zero, so it should
be best
10 matches
Mail list logo