On 30/08/18 10:43, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.08.18 at 10:31, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 30/08/18 10:16, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 29.08.18 at 20:23, <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: >>>> The topology information obtainable via XEN_SYSCTL_cputopoinfo is >>>> filled rather weird: the size of the array is derived from the highest >>>> online cpu number, while the data is set to "invalid" for not present >>>> cpus only. >>>> >>>> With smt=0 the information for parked threads is all zero, so it should >>>> be best to return "invalid" information for offline cpus. >>>> >>>> On a dual core system without this patch xl info -n will print: >>>> >>>> cpu_topology : >>>> cpu: core socket node >>>> 0: 0 0 0 >>>> 1: 0 0 0 >>>> 2: 1 0 0 >>> >>> But there's nothing wrong here. The interesting part is what would be >>> printed for CPU 3 (perhaps on a more than two cores system). After >>> all topology is valid irrespective of whether a CPU is online - it all >>> depends on whether the hypervisor still has the information available. >>> It is for a reason that cpu_smpboot_free() invalidates certain fields >>> only upon CPU removal: >>> >>> if ( remove ) >>> { >>> c[cpu].phys_proc_id = XEN_INVALID_SOCKET_ID; >>> c[cpu].cpu_core_id = XEN_INVALID_CORE_ID; >>> c[cpu].compute_unit_id = INVALID_CUID; >>> >>> On a 6-core system I see >>> >>> cpu: core socket node >>> 0: 0 0 0 >>> 1: 0 0 0 >>> 2: 1 0 0 >>> 3: 1 0 0 >>> 4: 2 0 0 >>> 5: 2 0 0 >>> 6: 8 0 0 >>> 7: 8 0 0 >>> 8: 9 0 0 >>> 9: 9 0 0 >>> 10: 10 0 0 >>> >>> which looks fine to me, apart from the missing info on CPU 11. >> >> I can change the patch to print the information for the offline cpus >> (including the now missing ones), too. >> >> What is the preferred solution? > > Well, by implication from my earlier reply I think adding the missing > CPU's info would be better. Let's see what others think.
Okay. I'll do that and add another patch adding "(offline)" to the output in case a cpu is offline. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel